SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(DRAT) 293

DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Justice Shri G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
TNMB LTD – Appellant
Versus
G KUMAR AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI Dated the 4th day of February, 2025 PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON RA (SA) 74/2018 (arising out of SA 214/2013 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)

Between Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited Rep. by its Authorised Officer, No.52, ABC Vallal Pachaiappan Street, Kancheepuram.

Now the account is transferred to Asset Recovery Management Cell, No.4, T.T.K. Road, 1st Floor, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.

…..Appellant Bank And

1. Mr. G. Kumar, 961, School Street, Manampathy Village, Uthiramerur Taluk, Kancheepuram 631 501.

2. Mr. R. Madan, No.26/3, Tambaiah Road, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033 …..Respondents Counsel for Appellant Bank : M/s V. Chandrasekaran & Co.

Respondents remained ex parte.

ORDER

1. This appeal is filed under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act, challenging the order passed by Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-III, Chennai in SA 214/2023 on

30.6.2016.

2. Learned Counsel for Appellant Bank submitted that the Demand Notice to

1st Respondent had been sent and the same was refused by him. Affixture, publication of Demand Notice and Sale Notice had been done as per the procedure. While Demand Notice was refused by 1st Respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top