SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(DRAT) 339

DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Justice Shri G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
Y Bhaskar – Appellant
Versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA (CORPORATION BANK) – Respondent


O R D E R

1. Appellant has filed this Appeal challenging the order dated 08.11.2024 passed by Learned Presiding Officer, DRT-I, Karnataka at Bengaluru, in IA 1759/2024 in SA 404/2024.

2. Appellant filed SA 404/2024 on the file of DRT-I, Karnataka at Bengaluru, to quash and set aside the impugned Sale Notice dated 13.10.2022; set aside the Sale Certificate issued, if any, and for other reliefs.

2.1 Since the Securitization Application was filed with a delay of 638 days, the Appellant filed IA 1759/2024 seeking condoning of the delay in filing the Securitization Application. Learned Presiding Officer, DRT-I, Karnataka at Bengaluru, on going through the records, and after hearing the submissions of the Learned Counsel appearing for the parties, found that Appellant had not shown due diligence in filing the Securitization Application in time, and in the absence of valid explanation and when there is gross negligence and lack of bonafides on the part of the Appellant, refused to condone the delay of 638 days, and thus dismissed the Application filed for condoning the delay in filing the Securitization Application, and ultimately the Securitization Application was dismissed. Aggrieved again

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top