HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA, J
SMTI. MAYURAKSHI KAKATI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 5761 / 2023
Date : 27.06.2024 Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. GAHC010216452023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5761/2023 SMTI. MAYURAKSHI KAKATI D/O LATE KHAGEN KAKATI, R/O VILL-BAKARIGAON, WARD NO. 4, P.O. AND P.S.-MORIGAON, DIST-MORIGAON, ASSAM, PRESENT ADD- C/O MR SURESH PATHAK, R/O H NO-9, DOWNTOWN MILIJULI PATH, MATHURA NAGAR, P.O.-ASSAM SACHIBALAY, P.S.-DISPUR, DIST-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 CUM THE CHAIRMAN, STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MORIGAON ASSAM 3:THE TREASURY OFFICER MORIGAON TREASURY ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 27.06.2024 Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the respondents.
2. The case of the petitioner is that her father had died-in-harness on 28.01.2024. At the time of death, he was working under the establishment of the Treasury Officer, Morigaon as Junior Accounts Assistant. The petitioner had applied for appointment on compassionate ground on 30.03.2017. Her case was placed before the DLC and the DLC in its meeting held on 22.01.2022 had rejected the candidature of the petitioner on the ground that her mother is a Govt. employee.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been abandoned by her mother, for which she has been compelled to file a complaint petition for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and accordingly, it is submitted that the petitioner would be entitled for appointment on compassionate ground.
4. It is not in dispute that the mother of the petitioner is a Govt. servant. Therefore, the petitioner would not be entitled for consideration for appointment on compassionate ground despite the projection made by the petitioner that her mother has abandoned her. Moreover, in the case of State of West Bengal. Vs. Debabrata Tiwari, AIR 2023 SC 1467 : (2023) 0 Supreme (SC) 191, the Supreme Court of India has held that the inordinate delay even in part of the State to consider the application would make the petitioner disentitle for consideration for appointment on compassionate ground.
5. The observations made in paragraph 7.4 and 7.5 in the case of Debabrata Tiwari (supra) are quoted below:
7.5. Considering the second question referred to above, in the first instance, regarding whether applications for compassionate appointment could be considered after a delay of several years, we are of the view that, in a case where, for reasons of prolonged delay, either on the part of the applicant in claiming compassionate appointment or the authorities in deciding such claim, the sense of immediacy is diluted and lost. Further, the financial circumstances of the family of the deceased, may have changed, for the better, since the time of the death of the government employee. In such circumstances, Courts or other relevant authorities are to be guided by the fact that for such prolonged period of delay, the family of the deceased was able to sustain themselves, most probably by availing gainful employment from some other source. Granting compassionate appointment in such a case, as noted by this Court in Hakim Singh would amount to treating a claim for compassionate appointment as though it we
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.