SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 4570

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH, J
LABANYA PAIT DOLEY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 11 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 2868 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. M. Biswas, Advocate; Mr. N. Goswami, Govt. Advocate; Mr. R. P. Sharma, Sr. Advocate; Mr. D. Doley, Advocate; Mr. A. Deka, Advocate

The Executive Officer lacks authority to cancel a statutory meeting regarding a No Confidence Motion, and procedural irregularities render subsequent meetings void.

Headnote:(A) Assam Municipal Act, 1956 - Sections 28, 41, and 43 - Removal of Chairperson - Petitioner challenged the minutes of a special meeting held on 29.05.2024, which resulted in their removal from office - The Court found that the meeting was convened in accordance with the provisions of the Act, despite the petitioner’s cancellation due to the Model Code of Conduct - The second meeting held on the same day was deemed void ab initio for lack of notice and proper procedure. (Paras 24-26)

(B) Jurisdiction of Executive Officer - The Executive Officer does not possess authority to intervene in the proceedings for removal of the Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson, as per the provisions of the Act. (Paras 18-20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was elected as Chairperson on 12.04.2022, and following a requisition by 7 Ward Commissioners, a special meeting was called to discuss a No Confidence Motion. The petitioner cancelled a scheduled meeting due to directives from the Executive Officer, leading to a subsequent meeting where the petitioner was removed. (Paras 2-6)

Findings of Court:
The Court upheld the validity of the special meeting held on 29.05.2024 at 10:30 AM, while declaring the second meeting on the same day at 2:30 PM as void for lack of notice. (Paras 22-24)

Issues: Whether the minutes of the special meeting held on 29.05.2024 require interference? Whether the second meeting held on the same day is void? (Paras 16-17)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the Executive Officer lacked the authority to cancel the statutory meeting and that the Model Code of Conduct did not prohibit the special meeting concerning the No Confidence Motion. The second meeting was deemed void due to procedural irregularities. (Paras 18-22)

Result: Writ petition disposed of; removal upheld but second meeting declared void.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. M. Biswas, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Goswami, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 4 as well as Mr. R. P. Sharma, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. D. Doley, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondents.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the minutes of the special meeting held on 29.05.2024 at 10:30 AM whereby the petitioner who was the Chairperson of the Silapathar Municipal Board was removed.

3. The facts leading to the filing of the instant writ petition is that the petitioner herein was elected as the Chairperson of the Silapathar Municipal Board on 12.04.2022. It is relevant to take note of that the Silapathar Municipal Board constituted of 12 elected Ward Commissioners, 2 Ex-Officio members who are the concerned MLA and the MP. It is an admitted fact that out of the 12 elected Ward Commissioners, one elected Ward Commissioner had resigned.

4. A letter was issued on 01.12.2023 by 7 Ward Commissioners requesting the District Commissioner, Dhemaji Town to terminate the petitioner from the post of the Chairperson. In pursuance to the said communication, the District Commissioner, Dhemaji vide an email dated 12.12.2023 directed the petitioner to convene a Board meeting within 15 days from the receipt of the said letter. Pursuant thereto, a meeting was called on 05.01.2024 at 2:30 PM. The said meeting was decided in favour of the petitioner. Being aggrieved, the private respondents filed a writ petition which was registered and numbered as WP(C) No.168/2024. The said writ petition was disposed of vide the judgment and order dated 29.04.2024 holding inter-alia that the District Commissioner has no jurisdiction or authority to issue direction to call for the meeting. However, taking into account the provisions of the Assam Municipal Act, 1956 (for short, ‘the Act of 1956’), this Court left it open to the private respondents to take steps for calling for a special meeting in accordance with the provision of the Act of 1956 for a No Confidence Motion against the Chairperson or the Vice-Chairperson, if so desired.

5. Pursuant thereto, the private respondents who were 7 in numbers submitted a request for convening a special meeting under Section 28 of the Act of 1956 for discussion of No Confidence Motion against the Chairperson. The petitioner upon receipt of the said communication informed the Executive Officer of the Silapathar Municipal Board vide a communication dated 17.05.2024 that he has called the meeting at 11:00 AM on 24.05.2024 pursuant to the said request so made. The Executive Officer on receipt of the said communication issued by the petitioner informed the petitioner vide the communication dated 20.05.2024 that in view of the Lok Sabha election, 2024 and the Model Code of Conduct being operational, the meeting should be withheld till 04.06.2024 and the petitioner was accordingly directed to cancel/withdraw the special meeting which was scheduled to be held on 24.05.2024. Immediately on receiving the said communication from the Executive Officer of the Silapathar Municipal Board, the petitioner vide the communication informed the various Ward Commissioners about the cancellation of the said meeting.

6. It is also seen that on 23.05.2024, the Executive Officer of Silapathar Municipal Board also informed the Chairperson, the Vice-Chairperson as well as Ward Commissioners of Silapathar Municipal Board that he advised against the convening of the special meeting on account of the Model Code of Conduct and that he would not be able to join the meeting in connection with Silapathar Municipal Board. The private respondents thereupon on 27.05.2024 requisitioned another meeting on account of the failure on the part of the petitioner to hold the meeting as per the requisition and fixed 29.05.2024 at 10:30 AM to discuss about the No Confidence Motion aga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top