SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 436

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J
TRIDIV CHOWDHURY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 3279 / 2024



Advocates:
MR. SAILENDRA DEKA, GA, ASSAM

Administrative officers cannot adjudicate on ownership claims of land when possession is contested; jurisdiction lies with the Civil Court.

Headnote:(A) Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 - Regulation 41 - Land possession dispute - Petitioner claims ownership of land gifted by grandmother, while respondent alleges gift deed is forged - Circle Officer's jurisdiction questioned as no civil suit is pending - Court directs that demarcation of land shall not occur until Civil Court decides the matter. (Paras 2-7)

(B) Jurisdiction - The Circle Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on ownership claims when possession is contested, as per the Regulation. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner seeks protection against land demarcation actions initiated by the Circle Officer following an FIR alleging the gift deed is forged. The land in question is 2 Kathas 10 Lechas under specific dag and Patta numbers, and the petitioner claims it was legally gifted.

Findings of Court:
The Court grants interim protection to the petitioner, stating that the possession of the land shall not be disturbed without court permission until the civil matter is resolved.

Issues: The main issues include the jurisdiction of the Circle Officer in land demarcation matters and the validity of the gift deed in question.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes that jurisdiction lies with the Civil Court when ownership is contested, and administrative officers cannot intervene in such disputes.

Result: Interim relief granted to the petitioner.

ORDER

Heard Mr. D. Das, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. S. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Sarma, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the actions taken by the Circle Officer, Dispur Revenue Circle to demarcate the land, which was in his possession. The measure of land is 2 Kathas 10 Lechas covered by dag No. 289, 290, 323(Old) 428 and 429(New) of Patta No. 23(old) 1652 (new) of village Japorigog under Beltola Mouza in the district of Kamrup (M), Assam. It is submitted that this land was gifted to the petitioner by execution of a gift deed on 24.12.2007 by the donor late Debajani Choudhury, who is the grandmother of the petitioner as well as respondent No.4. 3. In pursuance to an FIR lodged by the respondent No.4 before the Geetanagar Police Station making allegations that the gift deed is a forged deed, the Circle Officer has made attempts to demarcate the land for the purposes of mutation.

4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner referring to Regulation 41 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation , 1886 submits that under the Regulation, if any person who claims to be the owner of the land were not in possession, the matter is to be referred to the competent Civil Court. As such, the Circle Officer has no jurisdiction to entertain the matter. To the best of his knowledge, there is no civil suit pending questioning the authenticity of the gift deed. Only an FIR has been filed and investigations in that respect has been carried on by the Investigating Officer and the petitioner apprehending arrest had also obtained an anticipatory bail.

5. Under such circumstances, he submits that the respondent No.3 should be suitably directed not to take any steps to demarcate the land contrary to the claims of the writ petitioner till the matter is decided by the competent Civil Court.

6. Learned Government Advocate submits that she would like to complete her instructions. Accordingly, let Notice be issued on the interim prayer returnable on 29.07.2024.

7. Till the next returnable date, the possession of the writ petitioner on the land situated at village Japorigog under Beltola Mouza in the district of Kamrup (M), Assam as claimed shall not be disturbed without leave of the Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top