Back
HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI, J
SAPNANIL DAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal precedents supporting the right to default bail. (Para 27) |
| 2. court's reasoning on the validity of the charges and custody. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 3. petitioner entitled to default bail due to expired custody period. (Para 35) |
| 4. bail granted with conditions. (Para 36 , 37) |
ORDER
26.11.2024
Heard Mr. B. K. Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Haloi, learned Standing counsel, CBI.
2. By filing this petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 the accused- petitioner, namely, Sapnanil Das, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with CBI Case No. RC. 221/2024/E0014 (corresponding to Dispur PS Case No. 934/2024) under Section 21(1)/21(2)/21(3)/22/23 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (herein after as BUDS Act) and Section 406/420 of the IPC added Section 409 of the IPC and Section 316(5) of BNS, 2023 .
3. The brief fact of the case is that on 07/08/2024, an FIR has been lodged before the Director General of Police, Assam, stating inter alia that the petitioner, who is the owner of Trading For A Living (TFAL) introduced himself to be the No. 1 trading community in Assam and promised better financial su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
