ORDER

14.05.2024 None appears for the petitioner, when the matter is called. Heard Mr K Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents.

2. By filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner is seeking restoration of the all- round security protection as provided earlier to the petitioner.

Page No.# 3/7

3. Mr K Gogoi draws the attention of this Court to paragraph-7, 8 and 9 of the affidavit-in-opposition filed on behalf of respondent No. 4 on 11.10.2018. Paragraphs-7, 8 and 9 of the aforesaid affidavit is reproduced hereunder for a ready reference:-

“7. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph no.8 of the writ petition, the answering deponent begs to state that it is a fact that a threat assessment report in respect of the petitioner incorporating details and nature of threat was sought and received from the Superintendent of Police, Kokrajhar through the IGP (BTAD) Kokrajhar, wherein no specific threat was mentioned.

8. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph no. 9 of the writ petition, the answering deponent begs to state that it is a fact that in response to the petitioner's request for protection sent to the Assam Police Headqu