SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 7206

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. CHINMOY BARUAH, J
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
BIDYADHAR TANTI AND 38 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
MR. D K BAGCHI

ORDER

Date : 22.05.2024 Case taken up before the Lawazima Court.

Learned counsel Mr. D.K. Bagchi appears on behalf of the petitioners. Perused the records.

On a perusal of the office note dated 20.05.2024 reveals that notice was issued to the respondent Nos. 1 to 39 by registered post with A/D on 13.03.2024. Now, in regard to the aforesaid respondents, it appears that the A/D cards of respondent Nos. 5, 6, 11, 22, 23 & 30 have been received back. Upon perusal of the said A/D cards, it appears that the A/D cards of respondent No. 11 bears full signature of the respondent and the A/D card of respondent No. 30 bears purported signature of the respondent. As such, it may be said that service upon the respondent Nos. 11 & 30 has been completed. Next, in respect of the respondent No. 22 & 23, it appears that the A/D cards bear no signature of the respondents. But, on a perusal of the postal track consignment report available with the case record reveals that the notice in respect of the respondent No. 22 has been delivered to the addressee on 22.03.2024. As such, it may be said that service upon the respondent No. 22 has been completed. As far as the respondent No. 23 is concerned, the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top