SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 7179

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Susmita Phukan Khaund, J
JAHIDUL ISLAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
Bail Appln. / 2535 / 2024



Advocates:
MR. F A HASSAN, MR J HUSSAIN, HAFIZUR RAHMAN

Bail can be granted when further custodial detention is not necessary for investigation, and the accused is willing to comply with conditions.

Headnote:(A) BNSS, 2023 - Section 483 - Prohibition of Child Marriage Act - Sections 9/10/11 - Bail application - The petitioner has been in custody since 17.07.2024 in connection with a case involving child marriage leading to the victim's suicide - The Case Diary indicates the victim was a minor during marriage and that the petitioner was aware of this fact - The court determined that further custodial detention was unnecessary for the investigation, and the petitioner pledged to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. (Paras 1, 6, 10)

(B) Bail - Conditions - The petitioner was granted bail on the condition of cooperation with the investigation and not leaving the jurisdiction without permission. (Paras 10, 10.1)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused of being aware that the victim was a minor at the time of their marriage, which was forceful, leading to the victim's suicide. The victim had previously been in love with another individual. (Paras 4, 6)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the length of the petitioner's detention warranted bail, and there was no risk of flight. (Paras 8, 9)

Issues: The main issues included the awareness of the petitioner regarding the victim's minority at the time of marriage and the necessity of further custodial detention. (Paras 4, 8)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that given the circumstances, further detention was not necessary, and the petitioner displayed willingness to comply with bail conditions. (Paras 8, 10)

Result: Petition allowed; bail granted under specified conditions. (Paras 10, 11)

ORDER

05.09.2024 Heard Mr F A Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Jahidul Islam, who has filed this application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 , with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 17.07.2024, in connection with Garoimari PS Case No. 81/2024, registered under Section 108 of the BNS, 2023, read with Sections 9/10/11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act .

2. Heard Mr B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the bail petition cannot be considered without perusal of the Case Diary.

4. I have considered the submission on behalf of the petitioner that there is no dispute that the victim has committed suicide.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the order dated 14.08.2024, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon, in connection with Garoimari PS Case No. 81/2024.

6. The order is marked as Annexure-4 of the petition. The order depicts that the Case Diary reflects that the victim was a minor at the time of her marriage and the materials collected in the Case Diary reflect that the petitioner was aware that the victim was a minor at the time of her marriage and the Case Diary also reveals that the victim was forcefully given in marriage with the petitioner, as a result of which, the victim committed suicide. The victim earlier was in love with another person, but she was forcefully given in marriage by her father to the petitioner.

6. I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection. I have also scrutinized the Case Diary.

7. I have also considered the length of detention.

8. It appears that further custodial detention may not be required for the progress of investigation.

9. The petitioner has also pledged to cooperate with the remaining part of investigation. The petitioner is a local resident and he is not a flight risk. The petitioner is willing to abide by any stringent bail conditions, if imposed upon him.

10. Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only), with a suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup, Amingaon, under the conditions that:

(i) the petitioner shall cooperate with the remaining part of investigation, and ii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court, without prior permission.

10.1. On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall automatically stand cancelled.

11. Bail Application stands disposed of.

12. Send back the Case Diary.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top