SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 210

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
HITESH KUMAR SARMA, J
PRASANTA KUMAR DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
Bail Appln./544/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P. Bora
For the Respondents: Mr. D. Das, Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam

The Court determined that the severity of allegations and implications for public interest justified the refusal to grant bail, underscoring societal safety over individual liberties.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - Accused involved in conspiracy to leak question papers for police recruitment examination - Secured largescale money from candidates - Several serious charges against the accused including conspiracy and destruction of evidence - Court stresses on the severity and public interest in denying bail. (Paras 3, 4, 10, 19, 24)

(B) Criminal Conspiracy - Elements of bail - Court outlined factors for consideration including potential for witness tampering and likelihood of absconding - Social implications of recruitment scams highlighted. (Paras 15, 17, 22)

(C) Judicial Precedents - Precedents discussed included Arnesh Kumar and Amit Kumar cases to illustrate the stringent approach required for socio-economic offences. (Paras 7, 12, 22)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, previously a police officer, was arrested for alleged involvement in a conspiracy to leak question papers for a police recruitment exam, resulting in cancellation of the exam and significant financial loss to the state and aspirants. Evidence points towards the petitioner’s complicity in a large-scale conspiracy which threatens public trust in recruitment processes.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner’s request for bail was rejected based on grave accusations, evidence suggesting flight risk, and conflict with societal interests, reflecting an attempt to manipulate recruitment outcomes illicitly.

Issues: The core issues revolved around whether the accused posed a threat to the integrity of the judicial process and public interests.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that the freedom of an individual accused of serious socio-economic crimes can be curtailed based on the potential risks they pose to the judicial process and public order. The evidence revealing a conspiracy with serious implications substantiates the refusal of bail.

Result: Bail application rejected.

Table of Content
1. hearing and arguments for bail application. (Para 1)
2. details of the accusations and background of the case. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 12)
3. consequences of the alleged crime and its impact on recruitment. (Para 3)
4. arguments for and against granting bail. (Para 6 , 10 , 11)
5. court's reasoning on the balance between liberty and public interest. (Para 15 , 19 , 20)
6. conclusion on the bail application. (Para 24)

1. Heard Mr. P. Bora, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Das, the learned additional public prosecutor, Assam for the respondent.

2. Having filed the instant petition under Section 439 of the CrPC, the petitioner, namely, Prasanta Kumar Dutta has prayed for enlarging him on bail in connection with the CID P.S. Case No.21/2021 registered under Sections 120B , 120, 201, 204, 212, 420, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 66-B of the Information Technology Act (for short “IT Act”) and Sections 25 (1B)(a) and 25 (1B) (h) of the Arms Act and Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (for short “PC Act”). The petitioner was arrested on 07-10-2020 in connection with the aforesaid case and has been in detention since then.

3. The genesis of the abovementioned criminal prosecution may be traced to the Sub-Inspector (UB) Recruitment Examination (Written) for filling up 597 vacancies in Assam Police, which was to be conducted on 20-09-2020 in all the district headquarters across the State of Assam under the supervision of the District Level Selection Committees constituted by the State Level Police Recruitment Board, Assam. The First Information Report (for short “FIR”), on the basis whereof the aforesaid case was registered, was lodged by Shri Pradeep Kumar, IPS (Retd.), the Chairman of the State Level Police Recruitment Board, Guwahati. It was alleged in the FIR that the question paper of the aforementioned written examination had been leaked and circulated in WhatsApp messenger and as a result of which the written examination had to be cancelled. It was further alleged that the persons involved in the act of leaking the question paper, with their malafide intention, had damaged the image of the Recruitment Board as well as of the Government of Assam, apart from causing financial loss to the State Government and playing with the careers of the aspiring candidates. The complainant furthermore alleged that he had received the information about the leakage of the question paper through WhatsApp message from one Shri Gautam Mech.

4. It is imperative to note that after completion of the investigation into the alleged offences, a charge-sheet has already been laid against 36 accused persons including the present petitioner under Sections 120B , 120, 201, 204, 212, 420, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 66-B of the IT Act and Sections 25 (1B) (a) and 25 (1B) (h) of the Arms Act and Section 8 of the PC Act. The allegations leveled against the present petitioner in the said charge-sheet is extracted hereunder:

2. Sri Prasanta Kumar Dutta, S/O Late Sashidhar Dutta (A-2) He is found to be one of the prime accused persons along with accused Rubul Hazarika, Saroj Sarma, Kumar Sanjit Krishna and others, who are involved in the offence of entering into a conspiracy for leaking the question papers of the written examination for the post of SI (UB) of Police and circulating the leaked question papers through WhatsApp messages and by other means to different applicants/ guardians of candidates in exchange of huge money. Prasanta Kumar Dutta in connivance with his accomplices, namely, Nripen Nath, Manjit Bora, Jaydip Borooah, Rupam Deka, Jitu Mikir and Anowar Ali opened an office in Hotel Bhargav at Lokhra for organizing physical training to aspiring candidates in order to conceal their design and finally provided the copies of the leaked question papers to a number of candidates in exchange of huge amount of money at Hotel Bhargav Grand in the night of 19-09-2020. During search in hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top