SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 199

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
UJJAL BHUYAN, J
late JANAK SHAH, represented by SRI RAJ NARAYAN SHAH and ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA and ORS – Respondent
WP(C) 868/2010



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR.S S ROY
For the Respondents: MR.A CHETRY

Renewal of vending licences at railway stations must comply with judicial interpretations that restrict holders to one licence, ensuring fair access and adherence to operational policies.

Headnote:The court considered the policies affecting vending licences issued at railway stations, emphasizing the necessity for renewal eligibility criteria bound by the judgment in Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South Central Railways Vs SCR Caterers, and aligned its findings with the need to ensure fair tender processes for renewal of licences. The Supreme Court's determination stressed that only those without multiple licences could seek renewal, particularly following the passing of the original licencee affecting the entitlement of subsequent claimants. The court directed a fresh assessment to allot the vending rights among the deceased's heirs within two months.

Table of Content
1. vending license renewal process involves considerations of policy and historical permits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. past licenses and extensions shape entitlement under current regulations. (Para 8 , 9)
3. judicial precedent establishes criteria for renewals, limiting applicants based on existing licenses. (Para 10 , 15)
4. court directs equitable distribution of licenses among heirs following legal criteria. (Para 14 , 17 , 18)

ORDER

Date : 09-08-2018

This case was heard on 20.07.2018 and today is fixed for delivery of order.

2. Heard Mr. G. P. Bhowmik, learned Sr. Counsel; Mr. A. Kalita and Mr. R. K. Bhatra, learned counsel for the petitioners; also heard Mr. D. K. Dey, learned Standing Counsel, Railways.

3. This writ petition was filed in the year 2010 by Sri Janak Shah and his son Sri Kishori Shah. Prayer made in the writ petition was for quashing of letter dated 27.01.2010 issued by Divisional Commercial Manager, NF Railway, Tinsukia Division i.e. respondent No. 5 and for a direction to the said respondent to allow the petitioners to operate the stalls in the Tinsukia Railway station by renewing the license.

4. As per letter dated 27.01.2010, Sri Janak Shah was informed that as per existing policy, his vending license could not be renewed since there was no provision for renewal of vending licence at “A” category station and New Tinsukia station fell under category “A”. They were advised to close down the stalls within 15 days from the date of receipt of the said letter with the liberty to apply for allotment in due course as and when tender notice would be issued. This Court by order dated 05.02.2010 had issued notice and as an interim measure directed maintenance of status quo as on 05.02.2010. The said interim order has continued till date.

5. During the pendency of the writ petition, petitioner No. 1, Sri Janak Shah expired and he has since been substituted by two of his sons, namely, Sri Vijay Narayan Shah and Sri Raj Narayan Shah. Now after substitution, there are three petitioners, i.e., Sri Vijay Narayan Shah, Sri Raj Narayan Shah. Case projected in the writ petition is that in the year 1985 late Janak Shah, the original petitioner No. 1, was permitted by the railway authorities to construct a handloom stall at Tinsukia Railway Station (Old) at his own cost and on such construction, license for vending was issued to Sri Janak Shah on 09.07.1985.

6. In 1998 the handloom stall of Sri Janak Shah was permanently shifted to Tinsukia Goods Station (BG) i.e. the New Tinsukia Station. Sri Janak Shah was permitted to construct the handloom stall as per approved drawing. It is stated that on being allowed by the railway authorities, Sri Janak Shah and his son Sri Kishori Shah had jointly constructed another permanent stall in platform No. 1 of New Tinsukia Railway Station whereafter licence was granted for running one stationery-cum-miscellaneous goods stall. Thus the original petitioners had two vending stalls, one handloom stall and the other stationery-cum-miscellaneous goods stall at New Tinsukia Railway Station.

7. In the meanwhile, the Railways framed policy for issuing license to operate catering and vending service in railway stations providing for enhanced licence fee. Subsequently, the new policy was put in place by the Railway Board vide Commercial Circular No. 96/2007 which covered the two stalls of the petitioners. The new policy provided for allotment of licence to operate the stalls through a tendering system in “A”, “B” and “C” category railway stations. The tenders would be carried out in two bids systems i.e. technical bid as well as financial bid. Existing licencees were also made eligible to participate in the tender.

8. Grievance of the petitioners was that they had applied for renewal of their vending licences but that was not issued though they were allowed to continue their vending business by operating the two stalls. While trying to expedite the process for renewal of licence, petitioners were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top