SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 515

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J
BIJOY SEAL – Appellant
Versus
SMTI SEFALI SEAL – Respondent
Crl.Pet. 769/2012



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR.P J SAIKIA
For the Respondents: MSK KALITA

A divorced wife retains the right to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code unless she remarries or can sustain herself independently.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 125 and 127 - Maintenance petition - The petitioner sought to quash the revision order of the Sessions Judge reinstating maintenance to the respondent after divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion - The court emphasized that a divorced woman still qualifies as a ‘wife’ under Sec. 125 for maintenance, reinforcing the principle that divorce does not affect the husband's duty to maintain if she is unable to sustain herself - The petitioner’s claim of financial hardship was insufficient to justify the reduction of maintenance - Pivotal issue was whether the divorce status negated maintenance rights - Court found the earlier cancellation of maintenance authority lacked merit without evidence of changed circumstances (Paras 10, 14, 20, 22, 25).

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the Sessions Judge's order to reinstate maintenance, clarifying the status of a divorced wife regarding her claims under Sec 125 Cr.P.C.

Issues: Core issues included the applicability of Sec 125 concerning a divorced wife and the conditions under which maintenance can be varied or cancelled.

Ratio Decidendi: It was ruled that a divorce does not eliminate the right to maintenance under Sec 125 unless specific conditions of financial independence or remarriage are met; hence an earlier reduction of maintenance was unwarranted.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks quashment of maintenance judgment (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. divorce decree issued against respondent citing cruelty (Para 5 , 6)
3. petitioner argues legal error in revision judgment (Para 10 , 11)
4. opposing counsel argues divorce does not negate maintenance (Para 12 , 16)
5. rights of divorced women under maintenance law. (Para 14 , 21)
6. legal implications of divorce on maintenance. (Para 17 , 18)
7. legal duty for maintenance persists post-divorce (Para 20 , 22)
8. revision petition dismissed; maintenance issue remanded (Para 26)

JUDGMENT

Date : 30-09-2020

1. The Court proceedings have been conducted by means of creating a Virtual Court with the help of technology.

2. This criminal petition has been preferred by the petitioner, namely, Sri Bijoy Seal, under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 , seeking quashment of the Judgment and Order dated 12.07.2012, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Criminal Revision No. 03(1)/2012. The petitioner and the opposite party, namely, Smt. Sefali Seal were husband and wife were married on 02.05.1995.

3. Because of differences which arose between them, the petitioner and the opposite party started to stay separately since the year 2004. The wife/opposite party filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C., claiming maintenance from the petitioner/husband @ Rs.5,000/- per month. The case was registered as Case No. 01M/2004 before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dibrugarh. The learned Court of learned Additional CJM, Dibrugarh by order dated 06.07.2006 on contest allowed the petition and directed the petitioner/husband to pay maintenance allowance @ Rs.1,200/- from the date of filing of the maintenance petition i.e. 19.01.2004 according to the English Calendar month. The husband was directed to pay the same by the 7th of the following month. Thereafter, in the year 2008 the husband under Section 127 Cr.P.C filed a petition under Section 127 before the Court of learned Additional CJM, Dibrugarh. By the said petition under Section 127 , the husband, namely, the petitioner herein prayed for variation of the earlier Order dated 06.07.2006 passed by the learned Court and to reduce the maintenance allowance from 1,200/- to Rs.500/- per month. The grounds urged in the petition filed under Section 127 by the husband (petitioner herein) were the substantial loss of income and financially hardship. The petitioner further referred to a divorce case being Title Suit(D) Case No. 3/2004 filed, in the meantime, between the parties which was pending before the learned District Court, Dibrugarh at the relevant point of time when the petition under Section 127 was filed. It was further urged by the husband that by order dated 20.07.2005, passed in Misc.(J) Case No. 49/2004 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, an amount of Rs.1,200/- was also directed to be paid to the wife by the learned District Judge, Dibrugarh as maintenance pendent lite. Under such circumstances by the petition under Section 127 , the husband sought for reduction of the maintenance from Rs.1,200/- to Rs.500/- per month.

4. The wife (opposite party herein) contested the case by filing the written objections.

5. In the meanwhile, the divorce case being Title Suit(D) No. 3/2004 was decreed in favour of the husband by the Judgment and Order dated 12.11.2009, passed by the District Judge, Dibrugarh, for dissolution of the marriage between the wife and the husband. By the said judgment, the marriage was dissolved by decree of divorce under Section 13 (1)(i-a) and (i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 . In the said suit decreed one of the issues framed by the learned District Judge, Dibrugarh was “whether the allegations brought by the petitioner are true? If any, whether these allegations amount to cruelty and desertion?”

6. The learned District Judge by the said judgment decreed the title suit granting divorce by holding as under:-

“From the materi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top