Back
HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA, J
LIAKAT ALI – Appellant
Versus
BINOY SAHA ROY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. declaration and confirmation of ownership (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. documentary evidence of land boundaries and ownership (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. plaintiff's claims and counterarguments (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. defendant's position and arguments in defense (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court's analysis and findings on evidence (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. outcome of the appeal and remand for reassessment (Para 25 , 26) |
ORDER
Date : 26-11-2018 Heard Mr. N.Dhar, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S.P.Roy, learned counsel for respondent.
2. The present appellant is the plaintiff who filed Title Suit No. 26/1993 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Darrang at Mangaldoi for declaration and confirmation of the plaintiff appellant’s right, title over the suit land and also for ejectment of the defendant respondent. Sadhan Ch Paul and Dinesh Ch. Paul were impleaded as proforma defendant Nos. 2 and 3 respectively in the suit. However they are not impleaded in this appeal. As per the plaint, the suit land measuring 1 bigha 2 kathas 10 lechas covered by dag No. 334 of periodic patta No. 213 of village Khaterchar under Pachim Sialmari Mauza and descr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
