Back
GAHC010258212022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3738/2022 MD. SAYEED AKHTAR ANSARI @ SAYEED ANSARI S/O LATE USMAN ANSARI, R/O BIHPURIA TOWN, WARD NO. 2, MAUZA, P.O. AND P.S.-BIHPURIA, DIST-LAKHIMPUR VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF SULEMAN SHEIKH, HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS 1.1:MUSTT. ARZOO BEGUM W/O SAJIDUR RAHMAN R/O WARD NO. 1 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA DIST-LAKHIMPUR
1.2:MUSTT. AANOWAR BEGUM W/O ISTAK KHAN R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA DIST- LAKHIMPUR
2:MD. ANISUR RAHMAN S/O LATE SULTAN SHEIKH R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN DIST- LAKHIMPUR
3:MD. IRSHAD SHEIKH S/O LATE SULTAN SHEIKH R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA DIST- LAKHIMPUR
4:MUSTT. FARJANA BEGUM W/O IRSHAD SHEIKH R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA DIST- LAKHIMPUR 5:MD. ARIF SHEIKH S/O IRSHAD SHEIKH R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA DIST- LAKHIMPUR
6:MISS ANJANA BEGUM D/O IRSHAD SHEIKH R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA DIST- LAKHIMPUR
7:MD. ASHIK SHEIKH @ KHURSED S/O LATE SULTAN SHEIKH R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA DIST- LAKHIMPUR
8:MUSTT. SHENAJ BEGUM W/O MD. ASHIK SHEIKH @ KHURSED R/O WARD NO. 2 BIHPURIA TOWN MOUZA AND P.O.-BIHPURIA TOWN DIST- LAKHIMPU Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
09.01.2023 Heard Mr. N. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant.
By this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed for correction of the names of the respondent No. 1(iii) appearing in the cause title of the connected CRP No. 257/2022 and also for correction of the name of the father of the respondent Nos.
2, 3 and 7 and the name of respondent No.8.
Mr. N. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that inadvertently a typographical error has been crept in the cause title of the connected CRP No. 257/2022 wherein the name of respondent No. 1(iii) has been reflected as “Aanowar Begum” instead of “Anowara Begum” and the name of the father of the respondent Nos. 2, 3, 7 appears as “Sultan Sheikh” instead of “Suleman Sheikh”. Mr. N. Ray further submits that the name of respondent No.8 has been reflected as “Shenaj”
instead of “Shehnaj”.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and considering the grounds cited in the paragraph Nos. 2, 3 and 4, the prayer for correction, as sought for by the applicant, is hereby allowed.
Accordingly, the name of respondent No. 1(iii) stands corrected and be read as “Anowara Begum” in place of “Aanowar Begum” and also the name of the father of the respondent Nos. 2, 3, 7 be read as “Suleman Sheikh” instead of “Sultan Sheikh”.
The name of respondent No.8 be read as “Shehnaj” instead of “Shenaj”.
Necessary correction be made accordingly.
With the above direction, the interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
