SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 9236

PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
RAMANI DAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent


Judgment & Order

Heard Shri R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri K.

Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the Judicial Department; Shri HK Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Gauhati High Court; Shri R. Dhar, learned counsel and Ms. S. Barik, learned counsel on behalf of Shri SK Medhi, learned Standing Counsel, AG, Assam and Shri R. Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel for the Finance Department.

2. Considering the issues involved which relate to non-payment of salaries to the petitioner as well as his “temporary release” from service as a Sweeper in the establishment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baksa and also considering that the contesting respondents have filed their affidavit-in-opposition, the writ petitions are taken up for disposal at the admission stage. However, before going to the issues directly, it would be convenient to narrate the facts involved briefly.

3. The establishment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baksa was created in the year 2007. Vide the communication issued by the Judicial Department, Government of Assam dated 31.03.2007, the sanction of the Governor of Assam for creation of 158 number of posts i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top