SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 382

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
HITESWAR SARMA – Appellant
Versus
GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED AND 3 ORS – Respondent


ORDER

04.11.2022 Heard Shri S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 3- the Competent Authority under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (herein after Act) as well as the Deputy Commissioner. Shri N.L. Ganapati, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 & 2 - GAIL.

The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing WP(C)/3739/2022 whereby an order dated 08.03.2022 was put to challenge. During the hearing of the said case, there was an agreement that the GAIL would deposit the suitable amount of compensation payable to the petitioner. An amount of Rs.2,93,16,564.92 was accordingly determined by the Competent Authority vide an order dated 22.07.2022. However, subsequently, the Competent Authority had passed another order dated 25.08.2022 whereby the earlier order dated 22.07.2022 was withdrawn. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the withdrawal of the earlier assessment was without any authority of law apart from the fact that the Statute does not provide any power of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top