SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 904

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
JUNALI BHARALI NATH AND 10 ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['A F N U MOLLAH', 'SC', 'PNRD', '', 'GA', 'ASSAM', 'FINANCE']

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the petitioners in the batch of the writ petitions. I have also heard Mr. P. Nayak, the learned Standing Counsel for the Finance Department as well as Mr. K. Konwar, the learned Standing Counsel, P&RD Department.

2. The dispute in the instant writ petitions relates to non-payment of the remuneration dues of the PRI members, who are the petitioners in the batch of writ petitions whose term ended in March, 2018.

3. It appears from Sections 12 (2), 39 (2) and 71 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 (for short, the Act of 1994) that the Presidents, Vice- Presidents and other members of the Gaon Panchayat, Anchalik Panchayat and Zilla Parishad respectively are entitled to receive certain allowances as may be prescribed in terms with the same and by virtue of Section 141 of the Act of 1994, the Assam Panchayat (Administrative) Rules, 2002 (for short, the Rules of 2002) was made by the State Government. In terms with Rules 13, 14 & 15 of the Rules of 2002, the Presidents, Vice-Presidents as well as each members of the Zilla Parishad, Anchalik Panchayat and Gaon Panchayat have been held to be entitled to certain monthl


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top