Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE, J
Pegmir Tarak Son Of Late Pegmir Takar – Appellant
Versus
Pegmir Punu Son Of Late Pegmir Neni – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner unable to appear (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's medical emergency (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. trial court's dismissal (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 4. order set aside (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT :
(KARDAK ETE, J.)
Heard Mr. N. Danggen, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Nikam, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against the order dated 20.08.2024 passed in Misc. Case No. 14/2024 arising out of T.S. No. 08/2016, by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ziro, District Lower Subansiri, Arunachal Pradesh, whereby, the review petition seeking review of the order dated 23.01.2024 and 24.01.2024 with a prayer to allow the petitioner to examine and adduce evidence has been rejected.
3. The case in brief is that the respondent herein filed a Title Suit being T.S. No. 08/2016 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ziro and the petitioner has been arrayed as defendant No.3. The claim of the respondent in the Title Suit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
