SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M/S. SURAJ (ASSAM) TEA MANUFACTURING CO. PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['N SAIKIA', '', 'L BORGOHAIN', 'P GOSWAMI', 'ASSTT S G I', '', 'SC', 'NEDFI', 'INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE']

ORDER

Date : 23/06/2022 Heard Mr. D. Sahu, learned counsel for the writ petitioners in WP(C) 5497/2020, WP(C)

2115/2020, WP(C) 3055/2020, WP(C) 4069/2020, WP(C) 4168/2020, WP(C) 5115/2020, WP(C) 5533/2020 and WP(C) 5595/2020. Also heard Mrs. N. Saikia, learned counsel for the writ petitioners in WP(C) 3989/2018, WP(C) 3990/2018, WP(C) 1711/2019, WP(C)

3764/2019, WP(C) 4044/2019 and WP(C) 4080/2019. Mr. Anjan Kalita, learned Standing Counsel, Industries and Commerce Department, State of Assam has appeared on behalf of the Industries Department in all the cases. Mr. A.K. Dutta, Mr. K. Gogoi and Ms. A. Gayan, learned CGCs are present on behalf of the Union of India. Mr. G. Das, learned Standing Counsel, NEDFI has appeared on behalf of the respondent (NEDFI) in WP(C) 3989/2018, WP(C) 3990/2018, WP(C) 1711/2019, WP(C) 3764/2019, WP(C) 4044/2019 and WP(C)

4080/2019.

The issue involved in all these writ petitions are common, viz. rejection of the petitioners’ prayer for grant of Central Capital Investment Subsidy under the North East Industrial Promotion Policy-2007 (NEIPP-2007) floated by the Central Government. The application for grant of such subsidy made by all the writ petitioners were e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top