ORDER

Date : 23-07-2021 Heard Mr. T. Pertin, learned counsel for the petitioner.

By filing this petition under Section 114 and Order XLVII [47] of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner prays for review of the Judgment dated

19.02.2021 passed in CRP-03/2019.

By the impugned judgment, an application filed under Section 50 of the Assam Frontier (Administration of Justice) Regulation, 1945 was dismissed. Now, the primary contention of the petitioner is that the order passed in CRP- 03/2019 needs to be recalled, as it was passed on the basis of erroneous interpretation of facts and law.

In order to buttress his point, Mr. Pertin has relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court that was rendered in Lily Thomas and Others v. Union of India and Others, reported in (2000) 6 SCC 224. Paragraph 56 of the judgment is relevant for the present matter, which reads as follows:

“56. It follows, therefore, that the power of review can be exercised for correction of a mistake and not to substitute a view. Such powers can be exercised within the limits of the statute dealing with the exercise of power. The review cannot be treated an appeal in disguise. The mere possibility of two views on the subjec