SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
SRI DHURBAJYOTI BORA – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAGHUNATH SATNAMI AND 4 ORS – Respondent


ORDER

Date : 01-08-2018 Heard Mr. Sheeladitya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.07.2018 passed by the learned Munsiff, Hojai, Sankardev Nagar in Misc(J) Case No.32/2018 in Title Execution Case No.7/2015.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits by referring to the report of the Civil, Nazir dated

25.06.2018 that with the help of police and lat mandal, the Civil Nazir had identified the decreetal land on which execution was to be carried out. It is submitted that the decree dated 30.09.2013 passed in T.S. No.81/2012(New) was put to execution and the decree was partly executed on 25.06.2018. However, because of paucity of time, the execution could not be completed. Thereafter, the respondents, who are judgment debtor had filed an application before the Court of Munsiff, Hojai under Section 47 read with order 21 Rule 58 read with Section 151 CPC, which was registered as Misc(J) Case No.32/2018.

On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the learned Executing Court, by the impugned order had stayed the execution, which is in challenge in the present application.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top