SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAHC010108082020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3178/2020 MUSLIMA BEGUM LASKAR W/O FAIJUR RAHMAN LASKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAKHIN KRINAPUR, PS SILCHAR SADAR, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6

2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI 08

3:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE SILCHAR DIST CACHAR

4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CACHAR

788001

5:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE SILCHAR POLICE STATION SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M J QUADIR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA

Advocates:
['M J QUADIR', '', 'K MIRA', 'S S ISLAM', 'GA', 'ASSAM']

ORDER

Date : 30.11.2022 Heard Mr. M. J. Quadir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.

Baruah, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State respondents.

This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to investigate the Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 u/ss. 120(B)/188/447/352/506/34 IPC properly and to submit the report to the concerned Magistrate within a specified period.

The petitioner had lodged an FIR, dated 09.03.2020, before the Officer-in-Charge, Silchar(Sadar) P.S., against as many as 5(five) accused persons named therein, alleging that they had forcefully entered the disputed land with JCB and 3 nos. of Tippers and started filling up the disputed land and had threatened the petitioner and her husband with sharp weapons. Pursuant to the aforesaid FIR, dated 09.03.2020, Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 under Sections 120(B)/447/352/506/188/34 IPC was registered. According to the petitioner, since the registration of the case, no action was taken by the respondents;

the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition.

The respondent No. 4, herein, has filed an affidavit-in-opposition, dated 21.12.2020, wherein, it has been stated that after registration of Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 under Sections 120(B)/447/352/506/188/34 IPC; the respondent authorities is investigating the case and pursuant to such investigation, several statements u/s. 161 of the Cr.P.C., have also been recorded.

The affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No. 4 on 21.12.2020, indicates that the respondent authorities are not sitting idle on the Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 and the investigation of the case has been taken-up by the I.O.. However, since the statement made by the respondent No. 4 in the affidavit-in-opposition filed that Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 under Sections 120(B)/447/352/506/ 188/34 IPC has been investigated upon, dates back to 21.12.2020; it is highly probable that Silchar P.S. Case concluded and the Charge Sheet/Final Report, as the case may be, may have also been submitted by the Police.

Neither the learned counsel for the petitioner nor the learned Government Advocate has instruction as to whether investigation of Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 under Sections 120(B)/447/352/506/ 188/34 IPC has been completed or not as 2(two) years have passed by since filing of the affidavit-in-opposition by respondent No. 4 on

21.12.2020.

In view of the above, this writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the Officer in-Charge of Silchar Police Station as well as the I.O. of Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 under Sections 120(B)/447/352/506/188/34 IPC, to conclude the investigation of Silchar P.S. Case No. 866/2020 under Sections 120(B)/447/352/506/ 188/34 IPC, if not already concluded.

If the investigation is not concluded as on date; the same shall be concluded by the authority concerned preferably within a period of 2(two) months from today since the case was registered as far back as in the year 2020.

The writ petition stands disposed of in terms above.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top