SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RUHUL AMIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['ALHAJJ INAM UDDIN', '', 'B M DEKA', 'N BEGUM', 'K M MAHANTA', 'K K MAHANTA', 'R MOMTAZ', 'PP', 'ASSAM', '', 'R A CHOUDHURY', 'H ALI', 'I A HAZARIKA']

ORDER

26.02.2020 Heard Mr. K. K. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K. M. Mahanta, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Addl. PP for the State and Mr. I. A. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No. 2.

2. This is an application under Section 439(2) Cr.PC for cancellation of bail granted to the respondent No. 2 by order dated 03.07.2019 in BA No. 1781 of 2019.

3. The learned Senior Counsel for the applicant has submitted that pursuant to the bail granted to the Opposite Party No. 2 vide order dated 03.07.2019, the Opposite Party No. 2 has misused the liberty and has started pressurizing the applicant with dire consequences, asked him to withdraw the case.

4. It is also submitted that the Opposite Party No. 2 is threatening the prosecution witnesses by threatening them to be implicated in the false criminal cases and accordingly, on 11.07.2019, an FIR was filed by one Fakhar Uddin Ahmed before the Superintendent of Police, Hojai Sankardevnagar. In the said FIR, it was alleged that while he was returning home from Borhawar Tiniali Bazar, on 08.07.2019 at about 1:00 p.m. the two accused named therein including the opposite part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top