KUNAL DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN, J
KUNAL DAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR. A K BHUYAN
For the Respondents: PP ASSAM

Table of Content
1. bail applications concern serious allegations of corruption in recruitment. (Para 1 , 2 , 6)
2. detention must not violate constitutional rights, and major factors include delay in trial. (Para 5 , 13 , 24)
3. personal liberty and right to speedy trial necessitate reconsideration of detention. (Para 11 , 12 , 31)
4. court grants bail, emphasizing that detention lacks necessity for investigation. (Para 32 , 33)

ORDER

Date : 04-10-2018 All above bail applications are taken together and disposed of by this common order as it relates to the same Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 936/2016.

2. The bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been preferred on behalf of the accused persons, namely, Dipak Kanikar, Kunal Das, Dilip Kumar Kalita, Badrul Islam Choudhury, Sibbira Imran, Sunayana Aidow, Rumi Saikia, Gitali Doley and Sudipta Goswami Bhattacharjee, in connection with Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 936/2016 (G. R. Case No. 3149/2016, subsequently registered as Special Case No. 02/2017) under Section 7/13 (1) (b) (2) read with Section 120 B/420/463/471/471(A)/201 IPC, pending before the learned Special Judge, Guwahati, Assam.

3. Be it mentioned that on different occasions bail pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATIRUMI KUMARI PHUKAN, JKUNAL DAS – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN, J
KUNAL DAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent