SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
NILA KANTA KALITA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


Advocates:
['B K MAHAJAN', '', 'P P BARUAH', 'A CHAUDHURY', 'PP', 'ASSAM']

ORDER

19.01.2022 Heard Mr. B.K. Mahajan, learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.

By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner, namely Nila Kanta Kalita has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Kokrajhar P.S. Case No. 881/2021 u/s 420/409/384 of the IPC.

The case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court.

Mr. B.K. Mahajan, learned counsel for the accused petitioner, contends that the accused is presently working as a Junior Engineer in the office of the Executive Engineer (Agri.), Kokrajhar and he is roped into a false and fabricated case. Mr. Mahajan further contends, drawing attention to the paragraph No. 11 of the petition, that one Gopal Prasad, reporter for a local news portal based at Kokrajhar made the video in question to go viral in the social media platform and by using various camera angles and by doctoring the video roped both the accused persons named in the FIR into a false and fabricated case. Mr. Mahajan also contends that the aforesaid Gopal Prasad had demanded an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- from the present accused petitioner as extortion money

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top