SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

GAHC040012612021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : WP(C) 439/2021

1:Kento Eshi (Ori)

S/o Lt. Poken Eshi (Ori), Resident of Keno Ori Market, Siyom Colony, Aalo, PO and PS Aalo, Distric West Siang, Arunachal Pradesh, Pin 791001.

Mobile No. 8119999173 VERSUS

1:THE STATE OF AP and 5 Ors.

Represented by the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of A.P, Itanagar

2:The Deputy Commissioner Aalo District West Siang Arunachal Pradesh

3:The Secretary Land Management Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar

4:The DL and RSO Aalo under Land Management Department West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh

5:The Commanding Officer

4 JAK LI Aalo West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh

6:The Defense Estate Officer (DEO)

Itanagar District Papum Pare Arunachal Prades 7. Gumsen Lollen S/o Lt. Tugum Lollen Village Panya, P.O/P.S Aalo District West Siang, Arunachal Pradesh representing Panya Dego Bogdo Rigo Along Town Boundary Committee (in short PDBRATBC)

as a Secretary.

Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)

BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA

ORDER

Date : 25-01-2022 Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms.

P. Pangu, learned Junior Government Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4 and Mr. D. Kamduk, learned Standing counsel, Land Management Department representing respondent no. 3.

2. None appears for the respondent nos. 5 & 6.

3. Mr. G. Lollen, learned counsel has also been heard for respondent no. 7, in view of Shri Gumsen Lollen having been impleaded as respondent no. 7 by an order passed today in I.A.(C)9/2022.

4. The challenge made in this writ petition is an order dated 02.12.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, Aalo, whereby, the claim and objection raised by the petitioner in respect of a notification issued under Section 11(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 2013) for acquisition of private land measuring 49.63 Acres at Aalo for Indian Army has been rejected.

5. The grievance of the petitioner is that in an area measuring 49.63 Acres of land at Aalo proposed to be acquired for Indian Army by issuing a notification under Section 11(1) Act of 2013 by the Deputy th Commissioner, West Siang District, Aalo, dated 30 September 2021, a portion of private land of the petitioner have been included therein, and despite inclusion of the private land of the petitioner in the aforesaid area, the petitioner’s name does not find in the list of beneficiaries notified by the Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District at Aalo. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioner is that since the petitioner’s name does not find in the list of beneficiaries issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Aalo, in a proposed acquisition of land measuring 49.63 Acres at Aalo, which includes the private land of the petitioner, the portion of the private land of the petitioner included in the land proposed to be acquired measuring 49.63 Acres is required to be demarcated and carved out in favour of the petitioner so that it remains out of the purview of the proposed acquisition of land measuring 49.63 Acres.

6. In the above backdrop of the facts, the case set out in this writ petition by the petitioner is that the grievance of the petitioner as highlighted hereinabove, have not been heard and considered by the Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Aalo before the impugned order dated 02.12.2021 was passed, thereby, not providing the petitioner adequate opportunity of hearing by permitting the petitioner to file a written objection and also to be represented by an advocate to hear the objection filed by the petitioner in respect of the proposed acquisition of land measuring 49.63 Acres at Aalo for Indian Army.

7. Notice of motion in the writ petition was issued on 22.12.2021, making it returnable today, whereby, it was provided that prayer for interim relief would be considered on this day.

8. Ms. P. Pangu, learned Junior Government Advocate, however, submits that she is yet to receive any instruction in the matter.

9. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties and also, in view of the specific contention raised by the petitioner that the impugned order dated 02.12.2021 has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Aalo, without providing the petitioner adequate opportunity of hearing by allowing the petitioner to file a written objection as well as to be represented by an advocate, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at the stage of admission hearing by directing the Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Aalo (respondent no. 2, herein) to pass a fresh order in the matter of claims and objections filed by the petitioner in connection with Government notification issued under Section 11(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisition of private land m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top