SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

GAHC010082342020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB 1418/2020

1:PRATAP PAUL ROY S/O- SRI PRIYATOSH PAUL ROY, R/O- JOYMATI NAGAR, BY-LANE-11, P.O.

PANDU, P.S. JALUKBARI, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781012, CONTACT NO- 9854666822(M)

VERSUS

1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J P DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Linked Case : AB 1430/2020 1:PRIYATOSH PAUL ROY S/O- LATE SRI PROMODE BEHARI PAUL ROY R/O- JOYMATI NAGAR BYE LANE 11 P.O- PANDU P.S- JALUKBARI DIST- KAMRUP(M)

ASSAM PIN- 781012 VERSUS

1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J P DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Advocates:
['J P DAS', '', 'MISS S SARKAR', 'PP', 'ASSAM']

ORDER

Date : 05-08-2020 Heard Mr. J. P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. J.

Baruah learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State of Assam.

This is an application, filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending arrest in connection with All Women P.S Case No. 62/2020 under Section 498(A) IPC which was registered on the basis of an FIR dated 26.05.2020 filed by the informant.

The allegations made in the FIR are that the petitioner, who is the father-in-law of the informant had caused mental and physical torture on the informant along with his family members comprising of his wife, daughter and son. According to the informant, the marriage with the petitioner’s son was solemnized on 01.03.2018 in Lakhimpur. The informant at the relevant point of time was working in SBI, Lakhimpur Branch while the petitioner’s son was working in a private establishment in Guwahati.

The informant alleges in the FIR that right after their marriage differences arose between the informant and her husband along with his family members including the petitioner. It is alleged that the family members have constantly inflicted verbal abuses and frequently insulted the informant and her parents on various grounds.

The informant alleged in the FIR that her husband started abusing her at her working hours in the office and repeatedly tortured her through messages and phone calls abusing her and insulting her as a characterless lady while making false allegations about the informant having relationship with her colleague and for which reason her husband and his family members including the petitioner alleged that the informant had deliberately delayed the process of her transfer from Lakhimpur to Guwahati. The informant further states in the FIR that because of her inability to obtain her transfer from Lakhimpur to Guwahati, the petitioner and his wife had suggested that they should proceed for divorce/dissolution of the marriage between the informant and the petitioner’s son. Subsequently, she managed to take transfer from Lakhimpur to Guwahati Branch. The informant states that her husband lost his job in the month of April, 2018 because of his inefficient performance and continuous extension of leave which he had obtained because of he suffering a knee injury. The informant stated that during those days she had consistently stood by him and encouraged him to study and apply for a better job. The informant also stated she had incurred substantial expenses for the treatment of her husband. In spite of that there was a constant complaint by her husband, the petitioner and other family members that the informant did not spend any money on the family. It is alleged that the informant’s in-laws consistently demanded for more money and because of which frequent quarrels resulted between the informant and her husband. The informant referred to several instances during which her husband behaved in an acrimonious manner towards the informant. The informant stated that there were several instances when her husband had physically assaulted her. Consequently, the informant being unable to continue her conjugal life with her husband had decided to shift to her sister’s place in a rental house where she is presently residing. On the basis of the allegations made in the FIR, the case under Section 498(A) IPC was registered and the investigation had commenced.

This Court by order dated 16.06.2020 while calling for the case diary passed an order granting interim protection to the petitioner on the conditions mentioned therein.

Today, the matter was heard and the case diary produced was duly examined. From a perusal of the case diary, it is seen that the statements of the informant, her sister, the petitioner, his wife, their son, namely, the informant’s husband, daughter of the petitioner and neighbours have been recorded. In his statements recorded before the police, the petitioner admitted to the marital discord between the petitioner’

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top