Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN, J
DILIP KUMAR KALITA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail applications disposed of together. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. allegations of corruption in recruitment process examined. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. nature of bail considerations and article 21 discussed. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. discussion on the gravity of charges and implications for bail. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. final direction for bail conditions emphasizes liberty. (Para 26 , 32) |
ORDER
Date : 04-10-2018
All above bail applications are taken together and disposed of by this common order as it relates to the same Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 936/2016.
2. The bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been preferred on behalf of the accused persons, namely, Dipak Kanikar, Kunal Das, Dilip Kumar Kalita, Badrul Islam Choudhury, Sibbira Imran, Sunayana Aidow, Rumi Saikia, Gitali Doley and Sudipta Goswami Bhattacharjee, in connection with Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 936/2016 (G. R. Case No. 3149/2016, subsequently registered as Special Case No. 02/2017) under Section 7/13 (1) (b) (2) read with Section 120 B/420/463/471/471(A)/201 IPC, pending before the learned Special Judge, Guwahati, Assam.
3. Be it mentioned that on different occasions bail petitions were moved before this Court which were rejecte
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
