SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
PINTU NANDI – Appellant
Versus
DIPSHIKHA SONOWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
['P HAZARIKA', '', 'A GAYAN', 'P K MUNIR']

O R D E R

26.09.2022 Heard the learned counsel Mr. P. Hazarika appearing for the petitioner.

2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India whereby the order dated 25.08.2022 passed by the District Judge, Dhemaji in Misc(J) Case No.3 of 2022 arising out of Title Suit (D) No.10 of

2020 is under challenge.

3. The petitioner married the respondent on 28.06.2022. The couple is blessed with a child. Thereafter, marital dispute started to arise. They jointly approached the appropriate court for divorce on mutual consent. 4. In the meantime, they had a written agreement regarding their child who was 7 years old at that time. They agreed that for the first four days of a week, the child will stay with the respondent and on the next three days, he will be with the petitioner.

5. Divorce was granted to the couple and after that, the respondent remarried another person.

6. Now, the respondent alleged that the petitioner has violated their agreement relating to the said child. He allegedly stopped sending the child to the respondent’s house. Alleging this fact, the respondent filed an application before the court below.

7. The court of the District Judge held that both side

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top