SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
JALEN NARZARY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent


Order

09.02.2022 None appears for the petitioner. However, Mr. N. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 5, Mr. A Hasan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, Mr. R. Borpujari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Ms. S. Baruah, the learned State Counsel, Assam for the respondent No. 4 are present.

2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that though he was having more than 20 years continuous service since his date of initial appointment on 01.05.1992 as MR Worker, he has been deprived of his pensionary benefits on the ground that he has less than 20 years of service counting initial appointment as on 01.05.1992 after deducting initial 6 years of muster roll service.

3. Such decision has been taken in view of Office Memorandum dated

20.05.2009, issued by the Finance Department, Assam whereby and whereunder it was provided that initial 6 years of service of Muster Roll Worker should be deducted for counting of pensionable service.

4. The said Office Memorendum was put to challenge in a batch of writ petition and vide a common judgment and order dated 04.12.2018, passed in WP (C) No. 1089 of 2015 (Sanjita Roy and others Vs. State of Assam and others), this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top