ARUP KR. MEDHI AND 132 ORS. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

MR. MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, J
ARUP KR. MEDHI AND 132 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR K K MAHANTA
For the Respondents: SC, ELEM. EDU

Table of Content
1. issues involved in writ petition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. advertisements for teacher recruitment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments regarding tet examination requirement. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. mandatory requirements for teacher qualifications. (Para 31 , 32 , 36)
5. court's final order on the writ petition. (Para 65 , 66 , 67)

ORDER

24.09.2018

Heard Mr. K.K. Mahanta, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K.M. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Senior Advocate and Additional Advocate General of the State assisted by Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned ASGI for respondent No.4.

2. The issues involved in this writ petition are –

(I) Whether a Writ of Mandamus or similar writ or direction can be issued directing the respondents State of Assam in the Elementary Education Department to relax the requirement of Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) Examination so as to proceed with selection process pursuant to the impugned Advertisements ‘A’ and ‘B’ dated 11.03.2018 and to consider the case of the petitioners for selection and appointment as Lower Primary and Upper Primary Teachers subject to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

MR. MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, JARUP KR. MEDHI AND 132 ORS. – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. – Respondent

MR. MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, J
ARUP KR. MEDHI AND 132 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. – Respondent