Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
Mr. , J
KANNAKI BRAHMA BASUMATARY – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. and 4 ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility of the petitioner’s land for dealership (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding land eligibility (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of land location versus advertisement criteria (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's ruling on maintaining discretion of the authorities (Para 13) |
| 5. outcome of the petition: dismissal (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER(ORAL)
Date : 21-01-2022
Heard Mr. A.Lal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and A.Zahid, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 ,3, 4 and 5.
2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the communication dated 24/8/2017, whereby the candidature of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the plot of land offered by her is outside the advertised area i.e. the offered plot of land does not fall under the advertised block Gossaigaon.
3. The brief facts of the instant case is that the concerned respondent authorities issued an advertisement dated 24/10/2014 by which applications were invited from eligible candidates fulfilling eligibility for award of RO dealership. In the said advertisement which has been enclosed as Annexure- 1 to the writ petition,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
