SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAHC040008852022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP 38/2022

1:Kabak Neema@Kabak Nima S/o Lt. Kabak Mili, Presently residing at Abotani Colony, Near Waii Apartment, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Dist. Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh, Mobile No. 813889977/9402046769 VERSUS

1:Kabak Onang Teri W/o Shri Kabak Neema, C Sector, Near CHC, Doimukh, PO and PS Doimukh, Dist. Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh, Mobile No. 9862174330/9402936328 Advocate for the Petitioner : Rinchin Ledo Thungon Advocate for the Respondent : K Loya BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Advocates:
['Rinchin Ledo Thungon', '', 'T Lamgu', 'K Loya', '', 'Tamo Taggu', 'Jumge Karbak', 'Jartum Gadi']

ORDER

13.09.2022 Heard Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.

K. Loya, learned counsel for the sole respondent.

2. In the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order No. DMK/EM-07/14/2020/544 dated

27.07.2022 issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Doimukh. The other order which is under challenge is the order dated 29.07.2022, issued by the President, All Doimukh Gaon Burah Welfare Association for conducting local Mel on 05.08.2022 for settlement of marital dispute between the present petitioner and the sole respondent.

3. The sole respondent who is the wife of the present petitioner lodged a complaint on 04.07.2022 before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Doimukh, inter-alia, praying for issuing an order for conducting local Mel for settling her marital dispute with the petitioner.

4. On such application being filed, the Sub Divisional Officer, Doimukh vide impugned order No. DMK/EM-07/14/2020/544 dated 27.07.2022, passed the following order:-

“ORDER A prayer petition dated 04.07.2022 received from Smti Kabak Onang Teri wife of Shri Kabak Nima B’ Sector Doimukh along with the enclose, that is the Mutual agreement dated

21.12.2017 relating to the physical affairs in between Shri Kabak Nima and Mrs Dora Yatik.

The petitioner has made serious allegation to the respondent Shri Kabak Nima JE WRD Doimukh who is her legal husband, stating that her husband is found to be in adultery with Mrs Dora Yatik and staying with her at Itanagar. Secondly petitioner alleged that she is being debarred from her conjugal life since 2017 and her husband does not attend the family needs.

In this regard Sri Tana Topu, HGB, President Doimukh Gaon Burah Welfae Association as arbitrator and following GB, Shri Tana Hari, GB Midpu, Shri Nabam Bukul GB Amba village to assist Shri Tana Topu. They are hereby authorize to conduct local Nyel at the very earliest under the provision of Assam Frontier Administration Justice Regulation Act -1945 and to fixed a suitable date and time to call both the parties to solve the dispute amicably.

Further, during the hearing of case. Both the parties are directed to bring maximum 4 (four) person from each side and not allowed to bring sharp weapons like Dao and Fire Arms etc and after hearing the case, a report be submitted to this office for further action”.

5. On the basis of the said order, the President of All Doimukh Gaon Burah Welfare Association, Doimukh, by the impugned order dated 29.07.2022, fixed a th date for Local Mel Proceeding on 5 August, 2022, at 08:30 AM onwards at Mel-

Ground Doimukh to settle their family dispute which is under challenge.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of enactment of the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 2021, the Sub Divisional Magistrate/Assistant Commissioner have no jurisdiction to issue any order directing the Gaon Buras/Village Authorities to hold Mel to settle the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the Deputy Commissioner and Assistant Commissioners were empowered to administer civil justice under the Assam Frontier (Administration of Justice) Regulation, 1945 but the same have now been repealed. It is his contention that under the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 2021, the Gaon Bura/Village Authority is vested with Civil jurisdiction at lowest level.

8. The learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that the proposition of law as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner is correct. Therefore, the learned counsel for the respondent further submits that since due to inadvertence, such application was filed before the Sub Division Officer, Doimukh, the respondent cannot be left remedy less. Accordingly he submits that even if such revision petition is allowed, liberty may be granted to the respondent to raise her grievance before the appropriate authority under the law.

9. I ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top