JUDGEMENT

Date : 15-09-2021

Heard Mr. A.K. Rokhum, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte for the respondent Nos. 1 to 33.

2. The respondent No. 1 is the Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC in short) constituted and governed by the 6 Schedule to the Constitution. The respondent No. 2 is the Executive Secretary, Chakma Autonomous District Council, Kamalanagar, Lawngtlai District, Lawngtlai. The respondent Nos. 3 to 33 are the private respondents, who have been appointed to Group C & D posts in pursuance to the impugned Notification dated 24.10.2019 and the Order dated 26.11.2019, without the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 issuing any advertisements for filling up the vacant sanctioned posts.

3. Mr. A.K. Rokhum, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the th impugned Notification No. 12032/41/2017-2018 (CADC)(G) dated 24 October, 2019 issued by the respondent No. 1 should be set aside, inasmuch as, the same provides that the State respondent Nos. 1 & 2 shall appoint only those persons to vacant sanctioned posts under the CADC, who have been nominated by employees of the Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC in short) and who have availed the Vo