SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
BISWAJIT BARUAH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Date : 08-02-2018 Heard Mr. A. Acharya, learned counsel for the appellant. None appears on call for the respondents although notice of this application has been duly served on the respondents No.1 and 2. The name of the respondent No.3 was struck off by the order of this Court dated

15.07.2015.

2) By an order dated 05.09.2013 passed by this Court in Misc. Case No.2540/2013, a sum of Rs.11.00 Lakh was ordered to be deposited in favour of the respondent No.1 before the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.4, FTC -cum- Member, MACT, Kamrup, Guwahati in MAC Case No.78/2008. The Lower Court’s record reveals that the said sum has already been withdrawn by the respondent No.1 on 17.12.2013. Hence, the respondent No.1 has the knowledge of pendency of this appeal. Accordingly, the matter is ex-parte heard against the respondents No.1 and respondent No.2. 3) By this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellant has challenged the impugned judgment and award dated 10.04.2013 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Kamrup, Guwahati in MAC Case No.78/2008 [MAC Case No.2931/2007(old)], whereby an award of Rs.14,97,644/- with interest @ 6% per ann

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top