SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
ROUSHANARA BEGUM AND 3 ORS – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['A BARUAH', '', 'B J MUKHERJEE', 'J P MORE', 'S K GOSWAMI R']

ORDER

27.09.2022 Heard Mr B J Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicants/claimants and Mr S K Goswami, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent/Insurance Company.

2. By this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with proviso of section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the applicants/claimants have prayed for condonation of 191 days’ delay in filing the connected appeal against the Judgment and Award, passed by learned Member, MACT, Morigaon, in MAC Case No. 48/2013, which was finally modified by order dated 27.02.2018, passed by the learned Member, MACT, in Misc (J) (MACT) Case No. 24/2017.

3. It is stated in the petition that the MAC Case No. 48/2013, was initially decided vide Judgment and Order dated 30.03.2016. Thereafter, they were expecting that the awarded amount, which was made payable by the Insurance Company would be soon disbursed to them. However, after waiting for a year, they came to know that the Insurance Company has filed a review petition vide M J (MACT) Case No. 24/2017 and they were informed by their Advocate that it may take some time. They kept on inquiring about the final outcome of the said review peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top