Back
N. KOTISWAR SINGH, J
BRAHMANANDA PATIRI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner contests adverse acr remarks. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. adverse remarks hinder promotion potential. (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. court analyzes the coherence of acr assessments. (Para 12 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 22) |
| 4. court mandates communication of adverse remarks. (Para 26 , 28 , 38) |
| 5. court expunges adverse remark from acr. (Para 42 , 44) |
ORDER
Date : 28-03-2019
Heard Mr. N. Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned standing counsel for the Forest Department.
2) The petitioner is aggrieved by certain remarks entered by the Reporting Officer in his ACR for the period of 2010-11 (from 04.01.2010 to 31.03.2011), in which the following remark was made under the column, “General remarks, if any” of ACR form:
“Sometime speaks wrong thing at wrong place and wrong time”
3) The contention of the petitioner in brief is that the said remark was totally out of place made by the Reporting Officer, which will be clearly evident if one goes through the entire ACRs recorded by the same Reporting Officer not only in the particular assessment year in issue, but also in subsequent assessment years and also the observations and remarks made by the Reviewing a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
