SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

REJIA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['G UDDIN', '', 'N Y KONYAK', 'P A TALUKDAR', 'ASSTT S G I', '', 'SC', 'ECI', 'NRC', 'F T']

ORDER

18.09.2019 (K.R. Surana, J)

Heard Mr. G. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. G.

Hazarika, learned counsel for the respondent No.1, Mr. J. Payeng, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2, 3, 6 & 7, Ms. A. Borgohain, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 and Ms. U. Das, learned counsel for the respondent No.5.

2) By this writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for setting aside the impugned ex parte opinion dated 06.03.2012, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners’ Tribunal No. 1st, Morigaon in F.T. (D) Case No. 348/2007, holding the petitioner to be a foreigner who had illegally entered into India after

25.03.1971.

3) Aggrieved by the ex parte opinion, two petitions were filed, one being petition No. 119/18 dated 03.04.2018 under Section 3A (1) of the Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964 read with Order IX Rule 13 CPC for vacating the ex parte opinion, and the other being petition No. 120/18 dated 03.04.2018 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning the delay in filing the petition to vacate the ex parte opinion. The said two petitions was registered as Misc. Case No. 14/2018 [arising out of F.T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top