SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 4336

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
DHRUBA KUMAR SAHA AND 14 ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) 5198 / 2024



GAHC010210112024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/5198/2024 DHRUBA KUMAR SAHA AND 14 ORS AGED 68 YEARS, S/O LATE BATRINDRA CHANDRA SAHA, BY OCCUPATION, ADVOCATE, R/O LANE NO. 1, CACHAR HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, SILCHAR- 2, P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM.

2: SRI KISHORE KUMAR BHATTACHARJEE AGED 67 YEARS S/O LATE KETAKI RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE BY OCCUPATION BUSINESSMAN R/O SRIBHUMI LANE HOUSE NO. 7 MALUGRAM MELA ROAD P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

3: SRI KAMAL CHAKRABORTY AGED 66 YEARS S/O LATE SUBODH LAL CHAKRABORTY BY OCCUPATION RETIRED SERVICEMAN R/O KURMI BUNGALOW ROAD SPANDAN FLAT NO. C-2 AMBICAPATTY SILCHAR- 4 P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR ASSAM.

4: SRI SIMANTA BHATTACHARJEE AGED 72 YEARS S/O LATE SATYENDRA CH. BHATTACHARJEE BY OCCUPATION RETIRED TEACHER R/O R.R. SHOME ROAD SILCHAR- 1 P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

5: SRI HILLOL BHATTACHARJEE AGED 48 YEARS S/O SRI HIRALAL BHATTACHARJEE BY OCCUPATION BUSINESSMAN R/O HOUSE NO. 7 PURNASHREE LANE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SILCHAR- 5 P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

6: SHEHAB UDDIN AHMED AGED 73 YEARS S/O LATE ABDUL MANNAN BY OCCUPATION RETIRED GOVERNMENT SERVANT R/O LAKHIPUR ROAD SILCHAR P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

7: SRI ARINDAM DEB AGED 54 YEARS S/O LATE ANIL KR. DEB BY OCCUPATION BUSINESSMAN R/O 109 SAHID HITESH BISWAS ROAD AMBICAPATTY P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR ASSAM.

8: SRI PRANAB DUTTA AGED 65 YEARS S/O LATE PRAMATHA NATH DUTTA BY OCCUPATION RETIRED GOVERNMENT SERVANT R/O HOUSE NO. 38 WARD NO. 4 MALUGRAM P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

9: SRI BUDDADEV DAS @ NANU AGED 63 YEARS S/O LATE SUDHIR CH. DAS HOUSE NO. 57 ARYAPATTY SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

10: SRI RANJIT CHOUDHURY AGED 62 YEARS S/O LATE MONORANJAN CHOUDHURY BY OCCUPATION BUSINESSMAN R/O RAHMANPATTY SILCHAR- 1 P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

11: SRI RAMENDRA BHATTACHARJEE AGED 67 YEARS S/O LATE REBOTI RAMAN BHATTACHARJEE BY OCCUPATION RETIRED CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE R/O DEVI PRASAD ROAD MALUGRAM P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR ASSAM.

12: SRI ASHU PAUL @ MOHITUSH PAUL AGED 68 YEARS S/O LATE MOHESH CH. PAUL BY OCCUPATION RETIRED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE R/O SHIBBARI ROAD MALUGRAM SILCHAR- 2 P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

13: SRI BASUDEV SARMAH AGED 65 YEARS S/O LATE SAILESH CH. SARMAH BY OCCUPATION SOCIAL SERVICE R/O SWARUPANANDA LANE MALUGRAM SILCHAR- 788002 P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

14: SRI ABHIJIT DAM AGED 64 YEARS S/O LATE BINOY KRISHNA DAM BY OCCUPATION RETIRED GOVERNMENT SERVANT R/O DEVI PRASAD ROAD MALUGRAM P.O. AND P.S.- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM.

15: SRI SANJEEV ROY AGED 50 YEARS S/O LATE GAURI SANKAR ROY R/O HOUSE NO. 133 ITKHOLA SILCHAR- 788002 ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006.

2:THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

3:THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION GUWAHATI- 6 DISPUR ASSAM.

4:THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION ASSAM BLOCK C

4TH FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 6 REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER.

5:THE DEPUTY/ DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR ASSAM.

6:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD CACHAR SILCHAR Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D CHAKRABARTY, MS D.CHAKRABARTY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD, MS S MOCHAHARI(R-

6),MR S DUTTA (R-6),MR SISHIR DUTTA(R-6),GA, ASSAM,SC, ECI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

ORDER

Date : 29-04-2025 Mr. S Dutta, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 6 prays for adjournment, which is not objected to by the petitioners’ counsel, list the matter on 15.05.2025 JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top