SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 4647

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Mathiem Linggi and 3 Ors. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP and 5 Ors. – Respondent
WP(C) 351 / 2022



GAHC040012062022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : WP(C)/351/2022 Mathiem Linggi and 3 Ors.

S/o Lt. G. Linggi, R/o ESS Sector, Itanagar, PO/PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh.

Phone No. 7005134496 2: Eken Riba Age:

Occupation :

S/o Lt. Doi Riba R/o Ego Yamin Village PO/PS Basar West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. Phone No. 9436895606

3: Abraham K Techi Age:

Occupation :

S/o Lt. Techi Taram R/o Nirjuli PO/PS Nirjuli Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh.

4: Nanom Jamoh Age:

Occupation :

W/o Shri Tobar Jamoh R/o Bank Tinali Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 5 Ors.

Represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of AP, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Govt. of AP Itanagar.

3:The Secretary/Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation :

Administrative Reforms Govt. of AP Itanagar.

4:The Secretary/Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation :

Finance Govt. of AP Itanagar.

5:TheSecretary/Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation :

Personnel Govt. of AP Itanagar.

6:The Arunachal Pradesh Information Commission Age: 0 Occupation :

Represented by its Secretary Hotel Bomdila Gohpur Tinali PO/PS Tinali Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging, D Tamuk,M Doji,T Tayeng,Doge Lona,Kirmar Ado Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Rintu Saikia,SC(APIC)

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

ORDER

Date : 30.04.2025 Heard Mr. D. Panging, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

Also heard Ms P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent Nos.1 to 5.

Pursuant to the order of the Court, passed earlier on 23.09.2024, the Chief Secretary to the Government of Arunachal Pradesh/respondent No.2; the Secretary/Commissioner, Administrative Reform, Government of Arunachal Pradesh/respondent No.3; the Secretary/Commissioner, Finance, Government of Arunachal Pradesh/respondent No.4 and the Secretary/Commissioner, Personnel, Government of Arunachal Pradesh/respondent No.5 on 28.05.2025 shall apprise the Court about their willingness to accept the contribution of the petitioners towards their pension fund in terms of the 2014 Rules, specifying further, the time frame (time limit) within which the issues involved in this writ petition can be resolved.

Copy of this order as well as the copy of the order dated 23.09.2024 passed earlier in this proceeding be furnished on Ms P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent Nos.1 to 5 forthwith for their necessary intimation to the respondent Nos. 2 to 5, obtaining necessary acknowledgment in that regard.

List the matter on 28.05.2025 No further time shall be granted to the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 for their instruction that was sought for by the Court on 23.09.2024.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top