SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 4657

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Tarh Thomas and 4 Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Kholi Tatang and 14 Ors. – Respondent
Cont.Cas(C) 1 / 2023



GAHC040000062023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/1/2023 Tarh Thomas and 4 Ors.

S/o Tarh Taluk, Resident of Pan Village, Mengio Circle, PO Mengio, PS Sagalee, District Papum Pare (AP)

2: Nabam Kaha Age:

Occupation :

S/o Lt. Nabam Tadap President All Pan Panchayat Youth Association (PPYWA)

Resident of Tacha Village PO Mengio PS Sagalee District Papum Pare (AP)

3: Tarh Saha Age:

Occupation :

General Secretary (APPYWA)

Resident of Pan Village PO Mengio PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

4: Tarh Kyabi Age:

Occupation :

Resident of Pan Village PO Mengio PS Sagalee District Papum Pare (AP)

5: Tarh Yarang Age:

Occupation :

GB Resident of Pan Village PO Mengio PS Sagalee District Papum Pare (AP VERSUS Kholi Tatang and 14 Ors.

Resident of Village Kusuk, PO Silsango PS Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh.2:Kholi Tai Age: 0 Occupation :

Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

3:Kholi Taniang Age: 0 Occupation :

Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

4:Kholi Bharat Age: 0 Occupation :

Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

5:Kholi Tagar Age: 0 Occupation :

Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

6:Kholi Sango Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Lt. Kholi Tacho Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

7:Kholi Yalum @ Olum Age: 40 Occupation :

W/o Lt. Kholi Lung

8:Golo Sai Age: 0 Occupation :

W/o Shri Golo Pania Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

9:Kholi Tahi Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Lt. Kholi Tagam Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

10:Kholi Taru Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Lt. Kholi Linto Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

11:Kholi Talam Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Shi Kholi Taru Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

12:Kholi Taram Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Lt. Kholi Hari Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

13:Kholi Tachang Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Lt. Kholi Taming Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

14:Kholi Tamang Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Lt. Kholi Linto Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.

15:Kholi Tatup Age: 0 Occupation :

S/o Lt. Kholi Sera Resident of Village Kusuk PO Silsango PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, M Tunar,N Maj,Maji Dui,Gyati Nehal,Dusu Rillung Advocate for the Respondent : Arup Bhatttacharjee, G T Sangma,L Kagung,Tokdak Tamin BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

ORDER

30.04.2025 Date :

Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioners.

By filing Vakalatnama on 23.05.2023, learned counsels Mr. Arup Bhattacharjee, Mr. G. T. Sangma, Mr. Likha Kagung, Mr. Tokdak Tamin, Tam Pahi and Ngurang Nyima appeared on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 providing the Telephone number of only the counsel Mr. Likha Kagung with 9402292447. Learned counsels for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 have also not provided their E-

mail addresses.

Since their appearance on 09.08.2023, took time to file their affidavits in the matter, which they have not filed till date.

However, Mr. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he received a copy of an affidavit on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 way back on 24.08.2023.

But there is no record of filing such affidavit by the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 nor said affidavit of those respondents is available in this case record.

Moreover, since 10.04.2024, the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 remain unrepresented.

Even today, though the names of the counsels for the respondents have been re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top