GAUHATI HIGH COURT
M/s B M Store – Appellant
Versus
The State of AP and 3 Ors – Respondent
WP(C) 9 / 2025
GAHC040018302024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/611/2024 M/s B M Store represented by Shri Kholie Hania, attorney holder of M/s B M Store, Son of Shri Kholie Tayo, a permanent resident of Upper Jumi, PO Kimin, PS Kimin, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented through the Secretary, rural Development, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Director Age: 0 Occupation :
Rural Development Papum Pare District Yupia Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Project Director Age: 0 Occupation :
Rural Development Papum Pare District Yupia Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation :
Papum Pare District Advocate for the Petitioner : Puto Bui, Talu Kamsar,M Bui Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (RD),Binter Picha Linked Case : WP(C)/9/2025 M/s B M Store Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:represented by Shri Kholie Hania attorney holder of M/s B M Store Son of Shri Kholie Tayo a permanent resident of Upper Jumi PO Kimin PS Kimin Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:represented through the Secretary Urban Development Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:Papum Pare District Yupia Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:District urban Development Agency Papum Pare District Yupia
4:The Director / Registrar Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:Satyajit Ray Film and Television institute Arunachal Pradesh Camp Office E.M. Bypass Panchasayar Kolkata 700094 ------------
Advocate for : Puto Bui Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 3 Ors: Advocate , Linked Case : IA(C)/265/2024 M/s B M Store Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:represented by Shri Kholie Hania attorney holder of M/s B M Store Son of Shri Kholie Tayo a permanent resident of Upper Jumi PO Kimin PS Kimin Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:represented through the Secretary rural Development Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
2:The Director Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:Rural Development Papum Pare District Yupia Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Project Director Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:Rural Development Papum Pare District
4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation :
Address:Papum Pare District Yupia Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for : Puto Bui Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 3 Ors: Advocate , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
Date : 01.05.2025 Heard Mr. P. Bui, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Picha, learned Standing Counsel, Rural Development for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 and Mr. R. H. Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State respondent No. 4.
On the prayer of Mr. Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General, the respondent No. 4/the Deputy Commissioner, Papumpare District, Yupia, is allowed to file an additional-affidavit apprising the Court about the updated status regarding the recruitment process in the Satyajit Ray Film & Television Institute, Arunachal Pradesh, located at Jote, Papumpare.
Such the additional-affidavit shall be filed on or before 23.05.2025.
List the matter on 27.05.2025.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.