SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 6029



SHAMIMA JAHAN J.

Heard Ms. T. Jini, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. I. Bam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Cr.P.C., by which the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondent No.1 i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Basar, Laparada District, Arunachal Pradesh to dispose of the execution proceeding pending in connection with Bango Level Keba (Keba for short) decision dated

16.09.2019.

3. The fact of the case is that in the month of September’ 2019, a complaint was filed by the respondent No. 2 before the Deputy Commissioner, Basar against the petitioner for mental harassment and physical assault alleged to have been committed by the petitioner. In pursuant to the complaint, the Deputy Commissioner, Basar appointed the Circle Head Gaon Bura as the Chairman of the committee and directed him to conduct a Bango Level Keba to decide the case. After hearing both the parties as well as the witnesses, the Chairman, on 16.09.2019, had decided, in terms of the decision of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top