Back
SHAMIMA JAHAN, J
Eraxon Tajom – Appellant
Versus
The State of AP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir details allegations of extortion and wrongful confinement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the validity of the fir and alleged circumstances. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's reasoning on maintaining fir based on evidence supporting cognizable offenses. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. conditions under which firs can be quashed. (Para 7) |
| 5. final conclusion upholding the fir's legitimacy. (Para 11) |
B E F O R E HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)
30.06.2025
1. Heard Ms. N Danggeng, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. T Ete, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Mr. K Lollen appearing for respondent No. 2. This petition is filed under Section 528 of the BNSS 2023 by which the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the First Information Report, being FIR No. 60/2024 registered under Section
61(2)/131/308(2)/127(8)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS , 2023.
2. The prosecution case is unfolded by the FIR dated 28.09.2024 lodged by the informant namely; Nyamar Rike, the E.E, RWD, Changlang Division wherein th it was stated that on 28 August, 2024, he came for some domestic works at Aalo and that the petitioner’ wife who was known to him called him to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
