2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 6491
Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, C, Arun Dev Choudhury, JJ
Smti. Sabita Phukan Majumdar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
WP(C) NO.1203 OF 2022
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. H.K. Das, Advocate, Mr. N.K. Sarma, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. P. Nayak, Additional Advocate General, Assam, Mr. A. Phukan, Standing Counsel, General Administration Department
The court upheld the requirement of a Graduation Degree for promotions as reasonable and necessary for administrative efficiency, rejecting claims of arbitrary exclusion of petitioners.
Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, and 21 - Assam Secretariat Service Rules, 2019 - Amendment requiring Graduation Degree for promotion to Superintendent - Constitutional validity questioned - Court held that prescription of higher educational qualification is permissible for classification and does not violate articles of equality. (Paras 3, 34).
(B) Administrative Efficiency - Valid ground for classification among employees in promotion - Higher qualification can be a basis, provided it bears nexus to administrative efficiency. (Paras 26, 28).
(C) Exemption Claims - Petitioners lack basis for claiming exemption from requisite qualifications as it does not align with the purpose of classification under higher post promotions. (Paras 11, 20, 34).
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, employees under the Assam Secretarial Subordinate Services, challenged the amendment to the service rules that mandated graduation for promotion, claiming violation of rights to equality and alleging arbitrariness in excluding them.
Findings of Court:
Court finds that the requirement of Graduation is reasonable and linked to the objectives of enhancing administrative efficiency.
Issues: Whether prescribing higher educational qualifications in feeder cadre for promotion is constitutionally valid.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the classification based on educational qualifications to promote administrative efficiency is valid and not arbitrary.
Result: The writ petition challenging the validity of the new rule is dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutionality of educational qualification requirements in promotions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims of discrimination and arbitrary exclusion by petitioners. (Para 12 , 13 , 20) |
| 3. court's rationale supporting educational qualifications for administrative efficiency. (Para 26 , 28 , 34) |
JUDGMENT & ORDER (CAV)
(Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)
We have heard Mr. H.K. Das, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. P. Nayak, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam, assisted by Mr. A. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel, General Administration Department for the respondents.
2. The petitioners are primarily aggrieved by the impugned proviso to Rule 5(5) of the Assam Secretariat Service Rules, 2019, by which a Degree of Graduation has been made mandatory qualification for promotion to the post of Superintendent for employees in the feeder post of Senior Administrative Assistant, thereby totally eliminating the promotional prospects of the petitioners, infringing their right to be considered for promotion.
3. The question raised before this Court, therefore, is “whether prescription of a higher educational qualification in the feeder cadre for promotion to the higher post by virtue of an amendment to the Service Rules is constitutionally valid?”
4. In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India and in supersession of the Assam Secretariat Service Rules, 1963, the Assam Secretariat Service Rules, 2019 was brought out, which was gazetted on 13.06.2019.
Under Section 3 of the above-noted Rules of 2019, the class and cadre have been provided. Class-I includes the cadre of
(i) Additional Secretary;
(ii) Joint Secretary;
(iii) Deputy Secretary, and
(iv) Under Secretary. In Class-II, there is a single cadre of Superintendent.
The Rules prescribe that each of the Class shall form an independent cadre and members of any cadre shall have no claim for appointment to a higher cadre except in accordance with the provisions of the Rules.
5. Rule 5 of the Rules of 2019 further provides that recruitment to the cadre of Superintendent in Class-II shall be made by promotion from the select list prepared for this purpose under Rule 7 from amongst the Senior Administrative Assistants in the Secretariat, who have rendered not less than 5(five) years of continuous service as Senior Administrative st Assistants on or before the 1 day of the year in which the selection is made and have passed Group-B training or equivalent as prescribed by the Government from time to time.
The proviso appended to Rule 5 further stipulates that the candidate must possess graduation Degree in any stream as academic qualification from any recognized University.
6. This above-noted proviso to Rule 5 offends the petitioners, whose services are controlled by the Assam Secretariat Subordinate Service Rules, 1963. They were initially appointed as Typists as per Rule 10(1) of the Assam Secretariat Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 (hereinafter to be referred as “Secretariat Subordinate Service Rules, 1963”), who were ultimately promoted to the posts of Senior Grade Typist after completion of minimum 4(four) years of service and then to the cadre of Lower Division Assistant/Junior Administrative Assistant in terms of Rule 8(2) of the Secretariat Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 (as amended) by following the criterion of selection from amongst the Senior Grade Typists of the Secretariat, who are Matriculate/pre-University/Higher Secondary passed.
7. The Secretariat Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 was amended vide Assam Secretariat Subordinate Service (Amendment) Rules, 2012. By the said amendment, Rule 8 & Rule 10 of the earlier Rules were amended, making Graduation as an essential educational qualification for promotion from the feeder post of Senior Grade Typist to Junior Administrative Assistant. However, the Typists recruited in the years 1987 and 1992 were exempted from possessing Graduate Degree for their higher promotions.
8. Not