SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7080

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR, C, Arun Dev Choudhury, JJ
ALL ASSAM TRANSGENDER ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
PIL/6/2022



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Swati B. Baruah
For the Respondent(s): Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, Mr. D. Nath, Mr. D.P. Borah, Mr. R.M. Das, Mrs. R.S. Chowdhury

Recognition of transgender rights necessitates inclusive recruitment practices distinct from binary gender norms.

Headnote:This PIL addresses the grievance of the petitioner regarding a discriminatory advertisement by the Assam Police for recruiting transgender persons for Sub-Inspector and Constable posts. The petitioner contends that clubbing transgender candidates with male candidates is discriminatory. The Court recognizes the necessity for distinct allocations and conditions catering to male and female transgender candidates, noting ongoing measures to include transgenders in societal and employment frameworks as guided by the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020. The Government must ensure future recruitment processes actively reflect these considerations.

27.11.2025

(Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)

We have heard Swati Bidhan Baruah, learned Advocate for the petitioner; Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 and Mr. R.M. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Social Justice & Empowerment Department for the respondent No.4.

This PIL seeks to address the grievance of the petitioner against the Police Department, Government of Assam, in particular, having published an advertisement which they claimed to be discriminatory, for recruitment of transgender persons as Sub-Inspectors and Constables.

Today, this Court has been informed by Mr. D. Nath that against the advertisement in question, the recruitment process has been concluded. This Court was also informed by Mr. Nath that not a single transgender person had applied against the said advertisement.

Thus, without referring to the advertisement, we need to point out certain facts, which would be necessary for any future recruitment process.

In the advertisement in question, provision was made for the transgenders but the number of seats allotted were clubbed together for male candidates and transgender persons. Separate number of seats were fixed for females.

The primary concern of the petitioner was that with the clubbing of transgender with male candidates, the female transgenders would have been required to undergo the rigors of the male candidates, which was discriminatory.

The concern of the petitioner, therefore, was 2(two) folds: viz. that there should be some allocation of seats for the transgender persons and within such allocated number of seats, it should be opened for the candidates to apply as a male transgender or a female transgender so as to be subjected to the same rigor as a binary male and female, respectively, in the process of recruitment.

Mr. Nath, learned counsel for the State submits that this would relate to the policy decision of the State. Unless a policy is framed, the Director General of Police or the recruitment body cannot go for such separate allocation, which would amount to reservation. What would be the percentage of reservation would have to be based on empirical data regarding the number, their social and economic status and other factors.

However, during the course of hearing of this petition, we have been told that in accordance with the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020, a State Level Transgender Protection Cell has been constituted on 14.10.2022 by the Assistant Inspector General of Police (R), Assam under the Chairmanship of the Director General of Police, Assam.

The transgenders in the State of Assam are provided with identity cards, making them eligible for specialized privileges, like medical facilities, ration cards, etc. Since the Supreme Court in the year 2014 recognized transgender persons as a third gender, the Governments of the States were directed to provide them with all kinds of reservation in education and employment, treating them as socially and educationally backward class.

Mr. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Social Justice & Empowerment Department has submitted that a proposal has been mooted to recognize the transgender community as a socially and educationally backward class, which will be placed before the State Cabinet for approval. After the Cabinet approves the proposal, the transgender persons will receive reservation in education and employment as per the norms in both the cases.

Once the proposal receives the assent of the State Cabinet, it would be the bounden duty of the recruiting bodies to allocate special number of seats. While doing so, special care would be required to be taken with respect to the kind of rigors that the members of transgenders would be subjected to. It would only be appropriate, which we say by way of suggestion, that male transgender would be subjected to the rigors like male candidates and female transgenders be subjected to the rigors of the female candidates. It would only be in keeping with the Transg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top