GAHC010007972022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : PIL/6/2022 ALL ASSAM TRANSGENDER ASSOCIATION (REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY), ADD- PANDU CABIN, NEAR RLY B.G. OFFICE, P.O.-

PANDU, PIN-781012, DIST- KAMRUP(M)

VERSUS

1: THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ASSAM, POLICE HEADQUARTER, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-781007

2:THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (LAW AND ORDER)

POLICE HEADQUARTER ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007

3:THE CHAIRMAN STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD MADHABDEVPUR REHABARI GUWAHATI-781008 (GROUND FLOOR OF APHC BUILDING)

4:THE SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM For the Petitioner(s) : Swati B. Baruah, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, Deputy Solicitor General of India.

: Mr. D. Nath, Senior Government Advocate, Assam.

: Mr. D.P. Borah, Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department.

: Mr. R.M. Das, Standing Counsel, Social Justice & Empowerment Department.

: Mrs. R.S. Chowdhury, Advocate.

B E F O R E –

–

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

27.11.2025 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)

We have heard Swati Bidhan Baruah, learned Advocate for the petitioner; Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 and Mr. R.M. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Social Justice & Empowerment Department for the respondent No.4.

This PIL seeks to address the grievance of the petitioner against the Police Department, Government of Assam, in particular, having published an advertisement which they claimed to be discriminatory, for recruitment of transgender persons as Sub-Inspectors and Constables.

Today, this Court has been informed by Mr. D. Nath that against the advertisement in question, the recruitment process has been concluded. This Court was also informed by Mr. Nath that not a single transgender person had applied against the said advertisement. Thus, without referring to the advertisement, we need to point out certain facts, which would be necessary for any future recruitment process.

In the advertisement in question, provision was made for the transgenders but the number of seats allotted were clubbed together for male candidates and transgender persons. Separate number of seats were fixed for females.

The primary concern of the petitioner was that with the clubbing of transgender with male candidates, the female transgenders would have been required to undergo the rigors of the male candidates, which was discriminatory.

The concern of the petitioner, therefore, was 2(two) folds: viz.

that there should be some allocation of seats for the transgender persons and within such allocated number of seats, it should be opened for the candidates to apply as a male transgender or a female transgender so as to be subjected to the same rigor as a binary male and female, respectively, in the process of recruitment.

Mr. Nath, learned counsel for the State submits that this would relate to the policy decision of the State. Unless a policy is framed, the Director General of Police or the recruitment body cannot go for such separate allocation, which would amount to reservation. What would be the percentage of reservation would have to be based on empirical data regarding the number, their social and economic status and other factors.

However, during the course of hearing of this petition, we have been told that in accordance with the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020, a State Level Transgender Protection Cell has been constituted on 14.10.2022 by the Assistant Inspector General of Police (R), Assam under the Chairmanship of the Director General of Police, Assam.

The transgenders in the State of Assam are provided with identity cards, making them eligible for specialized privileges, like medical facilities, ration cards, etc. Since the Supreme Court in the year 2014 recognized transgender