SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7967

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Lanusungkum Jamir, J, MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
BONALI DUTTA CHANGMAI AND ANR . – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent
WA / 326 / 2022



4:THE ADDL. SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPTT.

DISPUR GHY-6 ASSAM

5:THE DY. COMMISSIONER DHEMAJI DIST- DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787057

6:MRS. BORNALI DUTTA CHANGMAI W/O SRI BIPLAB CHANGMAI R/O GOWAL CHAPORI P.O. and P.S. and DIST- DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787057

7:MOUCHUMI DEKA D/O LT. SADANANDA DEKA VILL. BHARALICHUK P.O. and P.S. and DIST- DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787057 ------------

Advocate for : MR. P J PHUKAN Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG Date : 30-04-2025 Date of hearing : 24.11.2023 Date of Judgment : 30.04.2025 JUDGMENT & ORDER (CAV)

(L.S. Jamir, J)

Heard Mr. D. Das, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the appellants in Writ Appeal No.326/2022 and Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned counsel for the appellant in Writ Appeal No.10/2023. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, GAD, representing the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in Writ Appeal No.326/2022 and respondent Nos. 2 & 4 in Writ Appeal No.10/2023, Mr. R.K. Bora, learned Government Advocate, representing the respondent Nos. 4 in Writ Appeal No. 326/2022 and respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 5 in Writ Appeal No.10/2023.

2. These two appeals are preferred against a common judgment and order dated 08.09.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.5430/2016 and WP(C) No.6730/2016.

3 The Deputy Commissioner, Dhemaji, published an Advertisement on 04.04.2007, inviting applications from eligible candidates for filling up of few posts of amalgamated establishment of Deputy Commissioner’s Office, Dhemaji. Amongst the posts advertised, there were two posts of Stenographer with the educational qualification of having 10+2 with Shorthand and Typing speed of 80 and 30 words per minute respectively. It was also provided that preference will be given to Computer Diploma Holders and having knowledge of Word Processing. However, in the said recruitment process, there were no qualified candidates to fill up the posts of Stenographers.

4 Thereafter, the Deputy Commissioner, Dhemaji published another Advertisement on 27.02.2008 for filling up two posts of Stenographers and the educational qualifications stipulated therein was HSSLC Examination or an equivalent Examination of recognized University or Board with Shorthand and Typing speed of 80 and 30 words per minute respectively. It was also provided that preference will be given to Computer Diploma Holders and having knowledge of Word Processing. Further, the scale of pay was provided as Rs.3850-90-4480-120-4600-DB-120-5200-175-6600-250- 7350/- per month plus other allowances as admissible as per Rules. The advertisement further stipulated that appointment against the sanctioned vacant post will be made in accordance with the provisions of Assam Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2005 under Section 7(1)(G) (AFRBM Act of 2005 in short). The advertisement further provided that appointments will be made after getting necessary approval from the Government of Assam, General Administration Department.

5 Pursuant to the advertisement dated 27.02.2008, the appellants in both the writ petitions along with others submitted their applications for the said posts of two Stenographers. After completion of the selection process, the Deputy Commissioner, Dhemaji by two separate orders, both dated 17.06.2008, appointed the appellants in Writ Appeal No.326/2022 as Stenographer (under qualified) against sanctioned vacant posts of Stenographers in the scale of pay of Rs.3010-60-3490-90-3850- EB-90-4480-120-5200-175-6075/- per month plus other allowances as admissible under the Amalgamated establishment of the Deputy Commissioner, Dhemaji. It is worthwhile to mention herein that the scale of pay against which the two appellants were appointed was lower than the advertised scale of pay as per the advertisement dated 27.02.2008. Being aggrieved with the appointments of the appellants in Writ Appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top