SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 8084

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
PAPPU BISWAS – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS – Respondent


medical condition is contrary to the guidelines for Recruitment Medical Examination in Central Armed Forces and Assam Rifles. He submits that this guideline is also followed for this recruitment purpose by the CRPF authorities. Referring to clause XII (9), he submits that in the conditions which are listed for rejection of any prospective candidates for appointment during the selection process Sl No. 9 refers to The learned counsel for the “Keloid formation”.

petitioner however submits that this Keloid formation can be a ground for rejection only if the same interferes with the proper wearing of combatisedequipment. He submits that no such finding is recorded in the Review Medical Board and the authorities had rejected it merely because of the presence of Keloid formation. It is submitted that such conclusion by the Medical Board is contrary to the guidelines for recruitment medical examination. He therefore submits the writ petition be allowed and the authorities be directed to recommend the petitioner for appointment as he does not fall within the criteria prescribed at Clause-XII (9) of the guidelines for Recruitment Medical examination in Central Armed Police Forces and Assam Ri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top