HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
PAPPU BISWAS – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS – Respondent
medical condition is contrary to the guidelines for Recruitment Medical Examination in Central Armed Forces and Assam Rifles. He submits that this guideline is also followed for this recruitment purpose by the CRPF authorities. Referring to clause XII (9), he submits that in the conditions which are listed for rejection of any prospective candidates for appointment during the selection process Sl No. 9 refers to The learned counsel for the “Keloid formation”.
petitioner however submits that this Keloid formation can be a ground for rejection only if the same interferes with the proper wearing of combatisedequipment. He submits that no such finding is recorded in the Review Medical Board and the authorities had rejected it merely because of the presence of Keloid formation. It is submitted that such conclusion by the Medical Board is contrary to the guidelines for recruitment medical examination. He therefore submits the writ petition be allowed and the authorities be directed to recommend the petitioner for appointment as he does not fall within the criteria prescribed at Clause-XII (9) of the guidelines for Recruitment Medical examination in Central Armed Police Forces and Assam Ri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.