SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 8093

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
MANJULA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent


[Annexure-3], the F.I.R. dated 6.5.2022 [Annexure-4], and the F.I.R. dated 22.1.2024 [Annexre-7] lodged by the petitioner and for investigation of the cases in accordance with the law; and/or, [B] A writ in the nature of nature of mandamus shall not be issued directing the respondent authorities to act in accordance with the law under section 23 and 24 of the Mental Health Act, 1987, and also to provide for the security and protection to the life and property of the petitioner; and/or, [C] Such further and other orders shall not be passed as your Lordships may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice; and, [D] To make the Rule absolute on perusal of records and after hearing the parties to the case.

3. In so far as the prayer regarding a direction under Section 23 & Section 24 of the Mental Health Act, 1987 is concerned, this Court had observed in the Order dated 01.04.2024 that the Mental Health Act, 1987 had already been repealed. By the Order, the petitioner was directed to make necessary corrections in the writ petition. Though some corrections have been made by the petitioner, there is no correction made with regard to Prayer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top